Commentary around Nicola Sturgeon’s emotional appearance at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry is “not acceptable”, Scottish ministers have said.
Speaking to the inquiry on Thursday, Scottish Secretary Alister Jack said he “didn’t believe for a minute” the evidence Ms Sturgeon provided the day before, and he claimed she could “cry from one eye if she wanted to”.
Scottish culture and international development minister Christina McKelvie said Mr Jack’s remarks show women’s emotions are often used as a “sport” in politics.
Scottish Culture Secretary Angus Robertson said he would not provide a “running commentary” on Ms Sturgeon’s evidence session, but he praised the former first minister’s “diligent” handling of the pandemic.
Ms Sturgeon repeatedly fought back tears during her marathon evidence session on Wednesday as she said she will always “carry regret” at decisions she and her Government got wrong during the pandemic.
Speaking on Friday, Ms McKelvie said: “For some people, that is a sport to see women upset – and it is not acceptable.
“It has to stop”.
She praised the work of equalities organisation Engender for challenging sexism.
Mr Robertson refused to be specifically drawn on Mr Jack’s comments, but said: “I think fair-minded people will look at how evidence has been given.
“I know Nicola Sturgeon to be a tremendously generous person and I know how diligent she was throughout the worst of the pandemic, working literally day and night to try and make decisions.”
Mr Jack appeared before the inquiry on Thursday for the final day of the inquiry’s hearings in Edinburgh.
He said: “I watched that evidence from yesterday and I didn’t believe it for a minute.
“I think Nicola Sturgeon could cry from one eye if she wanted to.”
That came a day after Ms Sturgeon told the inquiry she acted with the best intentions during the pandemic.
She said: “People will make their own judgments about me, about my government, about my decisions, but for as long as I live, I will carry the impact of these decisions, I will carry regret at the decisions and judgments I got wrong, but I will always know in my heart, and in my soul, that my instincts and my motivation was nothing other than trying to do the best in the face of this pandemic.”
The UK Government declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel