The SNP should re-examine the issue of whether to withdraw MPs from Westminster following the chaos over its motion on Gaza, the party’s depute leader has said.
There were angry scenes in the Commons last week following Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle’s decision to allow a debate on a Labour amendment to the SNP’s motion calling for a ceasefire.
The Speaker apologised to MPs and then offered another debate to the SNP, which had not been able to vote on its own motion in the first instance, but on Monday the request for a debate was turned down.
Writing in the Sunday National, Keith Brown, SNP depute leader, said the “tradition whereby Westminster sidelines, marginalises or suppresses Scotland is not new”.
He said the reaction of some Labour representatives to how the Gaza motion was handled raises concerns about how Scotland would be treated if Labour were to win the next general election.
He wrote: “Given the ‘diet democracy’ of the UK and the denial of democracy to Scotland, it seems we now need to examine whether it is right to confer any legitimacy on an institution determined to deny democracy in Scotland.
“Some have believed for many years that Scotland should withdraw from Westminster while others believe it is necessary to be there, to make arguments on Scotland’s behalf, to promote and protect Scotland’s interests. I have tended to agree with this.
“But when the institution can so easily be manipulated to thwart Scotland’s representatives, the issue needs, in my view, to be re-examined.”
He said that seeing some Labour representatives, with “quite a few” honourable exceptions outwith their party in parliament “cock-a-hoop with having ‘dished’ the SNP (regardless of the substantive issue on Gaza) must be a warning for how Scotland will be treated under any Starmer-led UK government”.
Scotland’s Deputy First Minister Shona Robison said there is a debate to be had about the role of the SNP parliamentary group at Westminster but that the party is focused on leading on the issues that people are concerned about.
She told BBC Scotland’s Sunday Show: “I think our SNP parliamentary group at Westminster has an important role to play in leading on issues like, for example, Gaza when they brought forward a debate that recognised, for example, the need for an immediate ceasefire and talked about the collective punishment of millions of people, and I think that is where the SNP is at its best, leading on these issues.
“There is a debate to be had in terms of the role of our parliamentary group but for my perspective they are best when they are highlighting key important issues and leading from the front, as they have been doing on the issue of Gaza for example.”
Asked if she would be worried if they were talking about withdrawing, she said “I’m not aware that they are talking about that.”
She added that the group at Westminster is focused on “making sure the SNP continue to lead on the issues that people are concerned about like Gaza and that’s what they will continue to do”.
Labour’s shadow Scottish secretary Ian Murray MP said: “The SNP have been disengaged with Westminster for years, delivering nothing for communities across Scotland.
“At the general election Scotland has a chance not just to send a message but to send a government who will work to deliver the change that Scotland needs.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here