There must be a “radical rethink” of how autism and ADHD are assessed and treated in England if the NHS is to keep up with demand for services, a think tank has warned.
Surging waiting lists are down to changing social attitudes and better awareness of the conditions, according to the Nuffield Trust, which called for a “whole-system approach” across education, society and the health service.
It comes after figures published by NHS Digital last month revealed the number of patients waiting for an autism assessment in England is at its highest level since current data started in April 2019.
Some 172,040 people were on waiting lists as of December 2023, up from 117,020 a year earlier and more than five times the 32,220 recorded in December 2019.
Although the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) recommends people with suspected autism should be diagnosed within three months of a referral, some 147,070 patients had been waiting at least 13 weeks in December, more than six times the 24,250 in December 2019.
New analysis of the data by Nuffield Trust found 79% of people who had been waiting 13 weeks or longer had not had their first appointment with a specialist, up from 44% in December 2019.
Between October and December last year, those who had their first appointment waited an average of nine months from referral.
In December 2019, the wait was an average of four months, the think tank claims.
Thea Stein, chief executive of the Nuffield Trust, said: “The extraordinary, unpredicted and unprecedented rise in demand for autism assessments and ADHD treatments have completely overtaken the NHS’s capacity to meet them.
“It is frankly impossible to imagine how the system can grow fast enough to fulfil this demand.
“We shouldn’t underestimate what this means for children in particular: many schools expect an assessment and formal diagnosis to access support – and children and their families suffer whilst they wait.”
Nuffield Trust also warned waiting times to be assessed for ADHD could be going unnoticed because of a lack of national data published.
It claims there has been a 51% rise in the number of people being prescribed medication for ADHD.
The analysis showed a 28% increase in drugs prescribed to 10 to 14-year-olds, as well as a 146% jump among 30 to 34-year-olds.
Ms Stein warned the current health service model is “obsolete” when it comes to dealing with surging demand for autism and ADHD assessment and treatment.
“We are only now beginning to recognise just how many people are neurodiverse,” she said.
“The challenge is that we have an obsolete health service model in place to deal with this avalanche of need.
“The huge rise detailed in our analysis is likely to be down to a combination of changing social attitudes and better awareness.
“We need to urgently understand the different elements of this complex picture and find a whole system approach across education, society at large and the health service.
“Pumping more money into the current model certainly isn’t the solution: a radical rethink is required.”
An NHS spokesperson said: “The NHS is fully committed to supporting and improving the lives of those with ADHD and autism which is why we have published new national guidance to help local areas to manage the 50% increase in referrals they have seen over last year.
“NHS England has also begun important work into investigating challenges in ADHD service provision and last month launched a cross sector taskforce alongside government, to help provide a joined-up approach for the growing numbers of people coming forward for support.”
Sir Julian Hartley, chief executive at NHS Providers, said trust leaders are “deeply concerned” over wait times for people with suspected autism or ADHD.
“The impact of these waits on children and young people is of particular concern,” he added.
“Too many young people and their families face long delays in accessing community health services that are vital to youngsters’ wellbeing and development.
“Better investment in services is urgently needed so we can close the widening gap between demand and capacity to provide much needed care.”
The Department of Health and Social Care has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel