Lord David Cameron has faced accusations of hiding from scrutiny amid questions about the UK’s arms sales to Israel.
MPs from across the political spectrum have suggested the UK should stop selling weapons to Israel for fear of breaching international humanitarian law.
The issue has gained traction in recent days amid the political fallout after the killings of three British aid workers by the Israel Defence Forces, an attack it admitted was a “grave mistake”.
The Foreign Secretary’s Labour counterpart, David Lammy, has called for Lord Cameron to appear in the House of Commons and answer MPs directly on arms export licences.
It comes on the day Israel marks six months since October 7, when Hamas militants stormed into its territory and killed more than 1,100 people, lighting the spark for the Middle East conflict.
Lord Cameron meanwhile warned that Britain’s support for Israel is not unconditional.
In a letter to Lord Cameron, the shadow foreign secretary accuses the senior Government figure of having “gone silent” after claiming new counsel had been sought on the matter at the start of March.
“We cannot have a foreign secretary dodging scrutiny on arms sales, which is a matter of enormous legal and diplomatic importance,” Mr Lammy wrote.
He urged Lord Cameron to publish any legal advice the Government had received, and to reveal whether Downing Street had instructed him not to do so.
Mr Lammy also called for “an exceptional statement on the Gaza conflict” by Lord Cameron in the House of Commons.
The cross-party Procedure Committee of MPs has recommended the Foreign Secretary could make such a statement from the threshold of the chamber, known as the bar of the House.
Only sitting MPs are conventionally allowed to cross this line into the Commons.
Lord Cameron was also urged to issue a statement committing the UK to comply with international law on arms exports.
Export licences could not continue to be granted for UK arms heading to Israel if there was a risk that weapons could be used in a serious violation of international humanitarian law.
Writing in the Sunday Times, the Foreign Secretary issued a warning over Israel’s compliance with international law.
He placed further pressure on Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after the killings of three British aid workers, saying “this must never happen again”.
Rishi Sunak, meanwhile, said the UK continues to stand by Israel’s right to defend its security, as he marked six months since the October 7 attacks.
The Prime Minister also urged the Israelis to ensure aid gets into Gaza more swiftly.
The UK has announced a Royal Navy ship will be deployed to the eastern Mediterranean to help launch a new sea corridor for supplies, alongside £9.7 million funding.
A UK Government spokesperson said: “As part of the Government’s robust arms export control regime we periodically review advice on Israel’s commitment to international humanitarian law, and ministers act in accordance with that advice.
“The content of this advice and related assessments is confidential.
“Decisions on export licences are based on the strategic export licensing criteria. We would make public any decision to suspend or revoke existing licences.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel