Black and minority ethnic women are twice as likely to be on zero-hours contracts as white men, research suggests.
The TUC said its analysis of official data showed that BME workers, particularly women, were more likely to be employed on some of the worst contracts.
The union organisation said the study showed that 5.9% of BME women in work are on zero-hours contracts compared with 2.7% of white men.
BME workers were said to be “significantly overrepresented” on zero-hours contracts compared with white workers.
The TUC said its report, published ahead of its Black Workers Conference on Saturday, showed that the disproportionate number of BME workers on zero-hours contracts is a “prime example” of structural racism in action.
BME workers – particularly women – are more likely to be on the “some of the worst contracts, with the worst pay and conditions”, according to the union body.
TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said: “Zero-hours contracts are a nightmare for workers and a dream for bad bosses.
“They hand almost total control over hours and earning power to managers, making it nearly impossible for workers to plan their budgets and their wider lives.
“These are some of the worst contracts around, and BME women are twice as likely to be on these contracts as white men.
“That’s a prime example of structural racism in action.
“It’s time to end the scourge of insecure work once and for all, starting with a ban on zero-hours contracts, like Labour is proposing in its New Deal for Working People.
“That’s how you start to tackle the structural racism that is holding BME workers back.”
A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said: “Zero-hour contracts offer flexibility for people who may need to balance work around personal commitments whilst helping employers who have less demand for permanent staff.
“At the beginning of this month, the Government increased the National Living Wage for workers aged 21 and over, putting more money in the pockets of almost three million workers.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel