Kevin Spacey could face a High Court trial over a sexual abuse claim after a default judgment against him was set aside.
In 2022, the Oscar-winning actor was sued at the High Court in London by a man who claimed he had been sexually assaulted by Mr Spacey and suffered “psychiatric damage”.
The civil claim was paused after Mr Spacey was charged – and later acquitted – in criminal proceedings of a number of sexual offences alleged by four men between 2001 and 2013.
At a hearing on Tuesday, the court heard that lawyers for the actor – who is represented by the firm Carter-Ruck – were due to file a written defence after the end of the criminal proceedings, but had failed to do so.
A default judgment was subsequently entered against Mr Spacey in the civil case on his liability earlier this year.
However, after a judge set aside the default judgment at the hearing, the US star is now set to face a civil trial over the allegations.
In his bid to set aside the previous ruling, Adam Speker KC, for Mr Spacey, described the failure to file the paperwork as a “genuine error by his solicitor”.
The barrister told the hearing in London it would be unfair to proceed to a damages hearing and the contested allegations should instead be taken to trial.
Lifting the default civil judgment, Judge David Cook said that the lawyers had “quite frankly ‘mucked up’”.
He said: “There can be no excuse in my view for the date being overlooked.
“The simple fact of the matter is this is a claim where the defendant’s solicitors have made an error.
“In my view, that error should not be visited upon the defendant.”
Judge Cook added: “The interests of justice require that those allegations go forward to trial and the judgment in default should, therefore, be lifted.”
Claire Glasgow of Fieldfisher, who is representing the claimant, said after the hearing: “We are pleased that the judge recognised the seriousness of the claim and directed the court to proceed to trial.
“Our client is seeking justice in the civil courts for serious allegations against Mr Spacey, regardless of the findings of the criminal trial.”
The hearing comes after Mr Spacey denied allegations of inappropriate behaviour ahead of the broadcast of a Channel 4 documentary.
The programme, titled Spacey Unmasked, began airing on Monday and is said to feature testimony from men “regarding events they say took place between 1976 and 2013″.
Ahead of the broadcast, the 64-year-old actor, in an interview with former GB News presenter Dan Wootton, said: “I take full responsibility for my past behaviour and my actions, but I cannot and will not take responsibility or apologise to anyone who’s made up stuff about me or exaggerated stories about me.
“I’ve never told someone that if they give me sexual favours, then I will help them out with their career, never.”
Mr Spacey added: “I’ve clearly hooked up with some men who thought they might get ahead in their careers by having a relationship with me.
“But there was no conversation with me, it was all part of their plan, a plan that was always destined to fail, because I wasn’t in on the deal.”
A Carter Ruck spokesman said: “The allegations made in this civil claim are the same allegations made by one of the complainants in the 2023 UK criminal trial, in which Mr Spacey was acquitted.
“Each time he has been given the time and a proper forum to defend himself, the allegations have failed under scrutiny and he has been exonerated.
“Mr Spacey has the opportunity now to defend these allegations, as he did in the criminal proceedings, and he looks forward to justice being done once again.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article