There needs to be a “serious conversation” had about the future of the NHS, First Minister John Swinney has said.
With just a week left before the General Election, the First Minister said the poll would likely see a Labour government after July 4, which would make issues in the NHS “the Labour Party’s problem”.
North of the border, the health service is struggling with long waits for treatment, including in A&E and cancer care.
Recent figures showed the Scottish Government had never met its target to ensure 95% of patients wait no longer than 62 days for treatment after an urgent suspicion of cancer referral.
Under questioning from Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar following comments from BMA Scotland chair Dr Iain Kennedy about the future of the NHS at First Minister’s Questions on Thursday, Mr Swinney said: “I don’t think it’s any secret that we’re going to have a Labour government in a little while.
“We’re going to have to see how the dialogue develops.
“In a week on Friday, the issues that have been raised with me about the health service are going to be the Labour Party’s problem.
“What I’m calling for is a serious conversation about what lies ahead.”
The Scottish Government, he added, had “taken the hard decisions” – including increasing tax – to boost funding for the health service.
Labour plans in England, the First Minister said, would bring £134 million of funding to Scotland, shy of the £237 million the country received in health consequentials from the “awful Tories” in the most recent spring budget revisions.
“I invite Anas Sarwar to do the maths,” he added.
“We cannot prolong austerity and that’s what the Labour Party are offering.
“Until the Labour Party offers a sensible way out of austerity, people in Scotland won’t take it at all seriously.”
The First Minister’s response, Mr Sarwar said, was “embarrassing”.
“You have been in charge of the health service for 17 years and the chair of the BMA is now saying we have a two-tier health service,” he added.
Mr Sarwar – who has previously said the change his party seeks is a “two-stage process” – went on to point to the next Holyrood election.
“I cannot wait to have that honest conversation about the performance of this SNP government when it comes to the NHS in the run-up to the election in 2026, and neither can people across the country,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel