A security guard accused of plotting to abduct, rape and murder Holly Willoughby has told a jury he is “disgusted” by his previous attempts to kidnap and falsely imprison women.
Chelmsford Crown Court has been told of Gavin Plumb’s two previous convictions for attempted kidnap in 2006 and another two offences of false imprisonment committed in 2008.
He said he had a “stewardess fantasy” at the time he tried to force two air hostesses to get off a train in the space of three days in August 2006.
Plumb was handed a term of imprisonment of 12 months, suspended for two years, with supervision and activity requirements for his two kidnap attempts, and was jailed for 32 months for the false imprisonment offences.
The 37-year-old claimed his offences were a “cry for help” as he “needed to get out” of a toxic relationship.
Asked by prosecutor Alison Morgan KC what it felt like “when you put that tape around the wrists of that girl” in a shop in 2008, Plumb replied: “I was scared.”
He said “yes” when asked if he looked at the 16-year-old’s face and said “she was scared”, but replied “no” when asked: “Did you stop when you saw she was terrified?”
When Ms Morgan suggested his “target” was to sexually assault the girl, the defendant said: “My target was to get caught and get out of the toxic relationship.”
Plumb said: “I’m disgusted by my previous behaviour.”
Questioned on why he had attempted to kidnap the first air hostess, with the threat of a note which said he would shoot her, defence barrister Sasha Wass KC said: “What was going through your mind when you wrote those notes?”
Plumb said: “For me it was my only option – being in the relationship I was in, it was toxic – I was extremely young and I needed to get out.”
Ms Wass went on: “How did you think sending a note like that to a female on a train was getting you out of your relationship?”
The defendant said: “It was going to get me caught. It was going to get me incarcerated.”
Questioned about what had been going through his mind when he attempted to falsely imprison two 16-year-olds, Plumb said: “I just needed a way out of the relationship (with his ex-partner), knowing it worked the first time.
“I thought I would try something really big again to get away from the relationship.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article