Scotland’s first female Lord Advocate and chairwoman of the independent inquiry into the murder of Sarah Everard has been awarded an honorary doctorate.
Dame Elish Angiolini has been recognised by Edinburgh Napier University for her “major contribution” to the Scottish criminal justice system, the legal profession and to vulnerable victims across the United Kingdom.
The Glasgow-born lawyer has held a series of significant roles during her career.
After several years of working at the Crown Office, she became the first woman to be appointed as the regional procurator fiscal for Grampian and the Highlands and Islands, and then became the first non-political Solicitor General for Scotland.
She was appointed Lord Advocate – Scotland’s most senior law officer – in 2006, remaining in the post after the following year’s election and stepping down in 2011.
Since then, she has overseen several notable public investigations, including into the cremation of babies at Mortonhall Crematorium in Edinburgh, complaint handling by Police Scotland and the inquiry into how off-duty police officer Wayne Couzens was able to murder Sarah Everard in 2021.
Commenting on her honorary doctorate, Dame Elish said: “I am very grateful to Edinburgh Napier for this wonderful honour.
“I have been fortunate to have had some very different but fulfilling roles over many years, and each has presented a range of fascinating challenges.”
She was presented with her honorary doctorate during a graduation ceremony for students from Edinburgh Napier University’s business school at the Usher Hall in the city on Thursday.
Presenting the degree, Professor Richard Whitecross, head of law at Edinburgh Napier University, said: “Elish’s legacy as Lord Advocate is noteworthy.
“She balanced a respect for the strengths of the criminal justice system and its independence with a strong commitment to modernisation.
“This award is in recognition of her major contribution to the Scottish criminal justice system, to the legal profession and to vulnerable victims across the United Kingdom.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here