A group of influencers and former reality TV stars have pleaded not guilty to sharing an unauthorised investment scheme with the public, but will not be tried until 2027.
Former Towie cast member Lauren Goodger and reality stars Jamie Clayton and Scott Timlin appeared at Southwark Crown Court in London on charges relating to offering an unsanctioned financial venture to their Instagram followers.
Eight of the nine defendants pleaded not guilty to the charges, with a trial in early 2027.
Love Island’s Eva Zapico was unable to attend the hearing.
![Reality star Jamie Clayton outside Southwark Crown Court](http://image.assets.pressassociation.io/v2/image/production/e95af25115ebda3ec6b66456b8467eedY29udGVudHNlYXJjaGFwaSwxNzIwNzg1NjQ4/2.76816328.jpg?w=640)
The charges were put forward by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) at an earlier hearing this month, which has previously claimed the stars had promoted the scheme run by Emmanuel Nwanze, 30.
The FCA alleges Nwanze used the Instagram account holly-fx trends, alongside Holly Thompson, 34, to advise on buying and selling contracts for difference (CFDs) when they were not authorised to do so, between 2018 and 2021.
The CFDs, the FCA says, were high risk investments that saw 80% of customers lose money.
The body alleges Nwanze paid former Love Islanders Biggs Chris, 32, Clayton, 32, and Rebecca Gormley, 26, to promote that account to their followers in 2020.
![Reality star Scott Timlin at Southwark Crown Court](http://image.assets.pressassociation.io/v2/image/production/16317525c043b75677ae8164b632ca20Y29udGVudHNlYXJjaGFwaSwxNzIwNzg1NjQ4/2.76816327.jpg?w=640)
He also is alleged to have paid Goodger, 37, and her fellow Towie castmate Yazmin Oukhellou, 30, as well as Zapico, 25, and Geordie Shore’s Timlin, 36.
The FCA added that the combined total of their Instagram followers was 4.5 million.
A finfluencer is a social media influencer who gives advice on financial investments.
Each defendant is charged with one count of issuing unauthorised communications of financial promotions.
Should they be convicted, they face up to two years in prison.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article