The Government has not stepped in to offer financial support to troubled Belfast shipbuilder Harland and Wolff due to the risk of losing of public money, the Business Secretary has said.
The company, which is part of a consortium that landed a major contract to build new Fleet Solid Support ships for the Royal Navy, had applied for a £200 million loan guarantee from the Government as part of efforts to restructure its finances.
In a written statement to Parliament, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds explained why the Government had rejected the request to act as a guarantor on fresh lending sought by the company.
Mr Reynolds said the Government would also not offer direct funding to help maintain the company’s liquidity.
“After a detailed review of an application by Harland and Wolff for a UK Export Finance Export Development Guarantee (EDG), His Majesty’s Government has decided not to proceed with the provision of a guarantee,” wrote Mr Reynolds.
“This decision was based on a comprehensive assessment of the company’s financial profile and the criteria set out in our risk policies. We have also decided not to provide any form of emergency liquidity funding.
“While such a decision is not easy, it is my assessment, following extensive engagement by my officials with market players, that HM Government funding would not necessarily secure our objectives and there is a very substantial risk that taxpayer money would be lost.
“The Government believes, in this instance, that the market is best placed to resolve the commercial matters faced by Harland and Wolff.”
Harland and Wolff, which famously built the Titanic, has four sites – one in Belfast, two in Scotland (Methil on the Firth of Forth and Arnish on the Isle of Lewis) and one in England (Appledore in north Devon).
In a statement on Friday confirming that the Government loan guarantee had been rejected, the company said it would seek alternative new debt facilities from current lender Riverstone Credit Management.
The company said it was also engaging an investment bank – Rothschild & Co – to assess “strategic options”.
Amid ongoing uncertainty around the shipbuilder’s future, the company also announced that chief executive John Wood was taking a leave of absence with immediate effect.
Harland and Wolff said Russell Downs, an industry expert in refinancing and recapitalisation, would take on the role of interim executive chairman.
Commenting on the company’s move to seek further financing from Riverstone, Mr Reynolds said: “This should allow the business to continue pursuing its short and longer-term objectives, in which the Government continues to take an interest.
“In all our engagements with them, Riverstone Credit Management LLC has recognised the importance of the assets at Harland and Wolff as well as the people who work there, showing a desire to find pragmatic solutions that support HM Government objectives.
“Harland and Wolff indicates that these discussions on new financing should conclude in the next few days. This will involve the current CEO taking an immediate leave of absence and the onboarding of new management with a focus on recapitalisation and ensuring sustainable finances.”
The Business Secretary said he knew reports over the company’s future will have caused concern among employees, as well as those working in the connected supply chains.
He said he was working with colleagues across government and the devolved administrations to secure a “positive outcome” across all four sites.
“My ministerial team have also reached out to the trade unions represented across the four sites to reassure them that the steps set out by the company appear to me to hold by far the best prospects of ensuring business continuity, job security and the delivery of important existing contracts,” he added.
“My officials will continue to work closely with those in the Ministry of Defence and the National Shipbuilding Office on the Fleet Solid Support contract, for which Harland and Wolff remains a key subcontractor.
“Officials in the Ministry of Defence are also well engaged with the prime contractor, Navantia, UK to monitor delivery of this important contract.
“I welcome potential new financing for Harland and Wolff and the appointment of new management and wish them all the best in their continued efforts to build up this business.
“Shipbuilding supports 42,600 jobs nationwide, adds £2.4 billion to the economy every single year, and is an important pillar of our civil and defence industrial base.
“We are committed to supporting vibrant and successful shipbuilding and fabrication industries, and our skilled workforces who deliver them, in all parts of the UK, in which Harland and Wolff has its role to play.”
Unite the union, which represents the majority of the workforce at the company, said that the political focus must be on securing a long-term future for the Belfast shipyard, along with those in Scotland and England.
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: “Harland and Wolff’s workforce and the shipyards they work in are of critical strategic importance. Five years after Unite members secured Harland and Wolff’s survival in Belfast, the political focus must now be on attracting stakeholders who are committed to building a long-term future, rather than those looking to turn a quick profit.
“I have been very clear with ministers that our union will leave no stone unturned to defend these vital assets and Unite has been engaging positively with senior Government officials in order to ensure that this happens.”
Matt Roberts, national officer with the GMB union, added: “These are worrying times for workers and their families in Northern Ireland, Scotland and the South West.
“These yards have been at the heart of UK manufacturing for centuries – from building the Titanic to the ships that defeated the Armada.
“Now they are critical to our future security in building the Fleet Solid Support ships for our Navy and in providing the renewables infrastructure needed to reach net zero.
“These yards must be saved and their long-term sustainable future secured.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel