A hospital water system was filled “too early”, increasing the opportunity for contamination, a microbiologist has told the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry.
The inquiry heard that the water system at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEUH) in Glasgow was filled more than 12 months before it opened to patients.
Dr Tom Makin said he accepted that the water system has to be filled during the construction process to test that it is working properly but that this should be done “as late as possible” and that he was “surprised” it was done so early.
The inquiry is currently investigating the construction of the QEUH campus in Glasgow, which includes the Royal Hospital for Children.
It was launched in the wake of deaths linked to infections there, including that of 10-year-old Milly Main.
Dr Makin, a microbiologist, runs the Makin and Makin Consultancy which provides water quality advice to companies and healthcare facilities and previously worked for the NHS between 1968 and 2010.
He was contacted by NHS staff in Glasgow in April 2018 and asked to provide advice after contamination was found in the hospital water supply.
Dr Makin first visited the hospital on May 10 2018 and said that given the size of the hospital and the fact it was a new build he was not surprised there were issues.
The witness told the inquiry of a report by a Dr Susanne Lee which said that the water system was filled during construction and remained so for more than 12 months before the hospital began receiving patients.
He said: “Now, that’s an unusually long time to have a water system filled before it goes into operational use. I was quite surprised.
“As soon as you put water into a system it gives the opportunity for biofilm to develop. You should really only fill a water system as late as you can prior to it being used.
“I accept the people who constructed it have to put water in at some point to test whether it’s leaking and that it’s functioning properly so there is a period of time to allow them to do that.
“But if you do it too early, and I would consider a year prior to patients moving in too early, then that leaves it open, the opportunity, for contamination to occur.
“And not just for contamination to occur, we’re not just talking about micro organisms entering the water system and floating around, we’re talking about organisms getting into the water system and establishing biofilm and biofilm once it gets established is particularly difficult to remove.”
Dr Makin said that, in his view, a biocide should be put into the system as soon as it is filled with water to reduce the risk of problems
This could help prevent the accumulation of biofilm – a community of micro-organisms – the inquiry heard.
Graham Maciver, junior counsel to the inquiry, asked whether he gained an understanding of what the underlying causes of the issues at the QEUH actually were.
Dr Makin replied: “As far as I’m concerned, obviously, there was the issue of the size of the system, it was so big, so much more easily contaminated when you’ve got a big system like that.”
He said it was a “very complex problem which involved a lot of issues” and that “some of them were outside the control of people who were then occupying the building to a certain extent because they may have inherited some of the problems”.
He also told the inquiry that he did not know whether the water system was flushed or a biocide introduced during the construction process.
A spokesperson for Multiplex, the construction company which designed and built the hospital, said: “Dr Makin’s evidence in the public inquiry will be responded to in the fullness of time. It would not be appropriate for Multiplex to comment further at this stage. ”
The inquiry, taking place before Lord Brodie in Edinburgh, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel