A fatal fire at a housing block in 2009 should have alerted the London Fire Brigade (LFB) to the “shortcomings” in its ability to fight blazes in high-rise buildings, the final report of the inquiry into the Grenfell Tower disaster has found.
The report found that the Lakanal House fire in Camberwell, south London, “foreshadowed” the 2017 Grenfell Tower blaze.
It concluded that the LFB failed to “implement any effective response” to the fire in July 2009, which claimed six lives, despite understanding its lessons.
The report identified several key measures that should have been implemented by the LFB following that incident.
These included making better use of the knowledge it had gained of the dangers posed by modern materials and methods of construction, and providing regular training for its control room operators on handling many fire survival guidance calls at the same time.
“The tragic conclusion is that the Lakanal House fire in July 2009 forewarned the LFB about the existence of the shortcomings which revealed themselves once more on the night of 14 June 2017,” the report said.
“Those shortcomings could have been avoided if the LFB had been more effectively led in a number of respects, particularly in its response to the Lakanal House fire, and if use had been made of its knowledge of the dangers flowing from modern materials and methods of construction.
“On any view, that is a serious indictment of an organisation whose principal purpose is to protect the public, and of the quality of its leadership.”
Laying the blame at the feet of the LFB’s senior leadership, the report said this failure had many causes, including a “chronic lack of effective leadership”, combined with “undue emphasis on process and a culture of complacency”.
It named former LFB commissioners Roy Dobson and Dany Cotton as bearing “ultimate responsibility for the LFB’s inability to take effective action after the Lakanal House Fire”.
During the first phase of the inquiry, Ms Cotton said she would change nothing about her team’s response on the night of the Grenfell Tower fire.
Ms Cotton, who was the first female commissioner of the LFB, later stepped down in December 2019 in the wake of criticism over the service’s response.
The report also addressed the issue of the “stay put strategy” used during the Grenfell Tower fire.
The Grenfell Inquiry’s final report found that the strategy is only acceptable “if there is negligible risk of fire escaping into and spreading through the external wall”.
Calculating the risk of fire spread and the time needed for evacuations is a matter for a qualified fire engineer, the report added.
The report made a number of recommendations regarding the LFB in light of its findings.
These include establishing a College of Fire and Rescue to train firefighters, providing firefighters with digital radios, and training on how to respond appropriately to the loss of communications.
The report also recommended that His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services carry out inspections on the LFB’s training of incident commanders, its operational planning, its arrangements for implementing change, and its use of control rooms.
The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) called for the Government to go further than its recommendations.
General secretary Matt Wrack said the deregulation of recent decades must be “comprehensively reversed”.
He added: “The systems for delivering building safety must be brought under public ownership and must be given the resources they need.”
The London Fire Brigade said it was now “better prepared” to respond to high-rise fires but would not be “complacent”.
Commissioner Andy Roe said the brigade accepted every recommendation from the phase one report, and has since implemented “significant changes”.
These changes include new equipment, improved training, and better ways of responding to fires in high-rise residential buildings.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here