Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to remove a portrait of Margaret Thatcher from a Downing Street study was not about her “at all”, the Prime Minister said.
Eyebrows were raised by some in Westminster when reports emerged that Sir Keir would remove the painting of his predecessor from his private study at No 10.
But the Prime Minister said the reason for the move was because he did not like the idea of pictures staring down at him while he worked.
He told the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: “I use the study for quietly reading most afternoons where I have got to have… where there is a difficult paper that I need to.
“This is not actually about Margaret Thatcher at all.
“I don’t like images and pictures of people staring down at me.
“I’ve found it all my life.
“When I was a lawyer I used to have pictures of judges.
“I don’t like it. I like landscapes.”
Sir Keir added: “This is my study, it is my private place where I got to work. I didn’t want a picture of anyone.”
The portrait, commissioned by Gordon Brown in 2007, was hung in the room sometimes known as the Thatcher study by David Cameron.
The Prime Minister’s biographer Tom Baldwin revealed recently it the portrait had been removed from the room as Sir Keir found it “unsettling”, leading to backlash from some Tory-aligned commentators and politicians.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel