Ice Age teenagers from 25,000 years ago went through similar puberty stages as modern-day adolescents – challenging the view that today’s children are entering puberty earlier, scientists have said.
Researchers analysed the ancient bones of 13 people aged between 10 and 20.
They found most of these young people entered puberty by 13.5 years, reaching full adulthood between 17 and 22 years old.
This indicates these Ice Age adolescents started puberty at a similar time to teenagers in modern and wealthy countries, the researchers said.
Professor April Nowell, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Victoria in Canada, said: “Today, we have this sense that adolescents are entering puberty super early.
“It’s either because there are hormones in the milk or there are chemicals in the environment but actually our Ice Age teenagers are entering puberty at roughly the same age as teens today.
“And what that showed us is that, in fact, instead of our teens today being really anomalous, they are actually following a blueprint for when humans enter puberty that goes back thousands of years.”
For the study, published in the Journal Of Human Evolution, the researchers analysed specific markers in the bone associated with adolescence using techniques developed by Mary Lewis, from the University of Reading, to determine the age and sex of young people based on their bones.
One of the skeletons, called Romito 2, belonged to a 16-year-old male who lived in what is now southern Italy around 11,000 years ago and had a form of dwarfism.
His voice would be deeper, much like an adult male, and he would have been able to father children although he may still have appeared quite youthful with fine facial hair, the researchers said.
Prof Nowell said: “By analysing specific areas of the skeleton, we inferred things like menstruation and someone’s voice breaking.”
The team said the findings also shed light on the lives of these ancient people.
Prof Nowell said: “What we learned about teenagers (who lived) 25 to 40,000 years ago is that they were incredibly active members of their community.
“They were hunting, fishing and gathering and really helping their community to survive.”
She added: “It can sometimes be difficult for us to connect with the remote past but we all went through puberty even if we experienced it differently.
“Our research helps to humanise these teens in a way that simply studying stone tools cannot.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel