A military court in Congo handed down death sentences Friday to 37 people, including a Briton and three Americans, after convicting them on charges of taking part in a coup attempt.
The defendants, who also included a Belgian, a Canadian and several Congolese, can appeal the verdict on charges that included terrorism, murder and criminal association.
Fourteen people were acquitted in the trial, which opened in June.
Six people were killed during the botched coup attempt led by the little-known opposition figure Christian Malanga in May, which targeted the presidential palace and a close ally of President Felix Tshisekedi.
Mr Malanga was fatally shot while resisting arrest soon after live-streaming the attack on his social media, the Congolese army said.
Mr Malanga’s 21-year-old son, Marcel, who is a US citizen, and two other Americans were convicted.
His mother, Brittney Sawyer, has said her son is innocent and was simply following his father, who considered himself president of a shadow government in exile.
The other Americans were Tyler Thompson Jr, who flew to Africa from Utah with Marcel Malanga for what his family believed was a vacation, and Benjamin Reuben Zalman-Polun, 36, who is reported to have known Christian Malanga through a gold mining company.
The company was set up in Mozambique in 2022, according to an official journal published by Mozambique’s government, and a report by the Africa Intelligence newsletter.
Mr Thompson’s family maintains he had no knowledge of the elder Malanga’s intentions, no plans for political activism and did not even plan to enter Congo.
Mr Thompson’s stepmother said he and the Malangas were meant to travel only to South Africa and Eswatini.
The reading of the verdict and sentencing before the open-air military court were broadcast live on television.
Last month, the military prosecutor, Lt Col Innocent Radjabu called on the judges to sentence to death all of the defendants, except for one who suffers from “psychological problems”.
Earlier this year, Congo reinstated the death penalty, lifting a more than two-decade-old moratorium, as authorities struggle to curb violence and militant attacks in the country.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here