Scotland’s acting Energy Secretary has said she is “wary” of talk of a potential buyer of the Grangemouth refinery.
On Thursday, within hours of the announcement from owner Petroineos that the site would be closed and turned into an import terminal in the second quarter of next year, SNP MSP Michelle Thomson – who represents the area – said she was in discussions with a potential buyer.
However, a non-disclosure agreement prevented her from divulging details.
Speaking to the BBC on Sunday, acting Energy Secretary Gillian Martin said the Scottish Government had “no idea” who the potential buyer was.
“I think one of the things that I’m slightly wary of is the fact that Petroineos actually said around late November last year that their intention was to close the refinery in its current form and turn it into an import terminal,” she said.
“I would have imagined that if anyone was interested in taking over the refinery, that would have been the key point to get in touch, but obviously, I don’t know the background of these people.”
Ms Martin added: “I would like to know who they are, I would like to know what their background is.
“And I think Petroineos obviously would like to have an understanding of who this person is as well.”
Ms Thomson, who was elected for the SNP for Falkirk East in 2021, “did not know much about” the potential buyer when she spoke to Ms Martin about the situation, the Energy Secretary said.
“Since then, she says things have been fast moving, she’s got more information.
“She’s obviously said what she said at First Minister’s Questions last week about introducing them to the Government, but I think also Petroineos needs to be involved, because of course, they’re the people that would be selling the plant, if someone’s interested.”
When the decision was announced on Thursday, along with the likely loss of 400 jobs, both the UK and Scottish governments announced a £100 million investment package in the hopes of improving prospects in the Grangemouth area.
But Ms Martin was unable to say how many jobs the investment would likely save.
“That is going to be a matter for commercial companies coming into the area,” she said.
“I would imagine that at the moment, there’s quite a lot of companies looking at the skills layout of that workforce and making offers to those people that they need.
“They are a highly skilled, highly experienced workforce who have the skills that could be transitioned into making biofuels, into making hydrogen and, of course, running the import terminal.
“I am confident that those highly skilled people will find other work.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel