Sir Keir Starmer has said he will not “give an inch” to rioters as he dismissed concerns about immigration and deprivation as justification for riots across England during the summer.
The Prime Minister recognised that there were wider concerns about immigration and living standards and said that they needed to be addressed. However, Sir Keir called the unrest “pure thuggery” and said fears were not an excuse for rioters.
The National Police Chiefs’ Council said last week that police have made a total of 1,461 arrests since July 29. The CPS has brought a total of 965 charges.
Sir Keir told ITV Tyne Tees & Border: “I’m not prepared to give an inch of excuse to people who went on our streets – pure thuggery, terrified communities, tried to set light to buildings, (and) attacked the police.
“They needed to feel, and did feel, the full force of the law. And I don’t think anybody would disagree with that.”
He later added: “Is there a concern about deprivation? Yes. Is there a concern about issues like immigration? Yes, I readily accept that.
“We’re a democratic country and we settle those issues democratically. What I won’t countenance, and I don’t suppose anyone watching this will countenance, is those that took it on themselves to exact violence on other people.
“We debate difficult issues in this country (and) yes, we settle them democratically. Quite right. And there are people who agree with me or disagree with me – I absolutely understand that. (We are) determined to deal with deprivation, determined to deal with immigration. But I’m not going to give an inch to those that were violent.”
Sir Keir said politicians needed to be careful about the language they used about immigration. He was asked by ITV Calendar about his own comments during the general election that referenced difficulties in returning illegal migrants to Bangladesh.
A survey published on Thursday found that the public vastly overestimates how much asylum seekers account for in UK immigration, leading to “skewed perceptions” that make the debate on migration “unbalanced”, according to new research.
The study by British Future and Ipsos found that, on average, respondents thought those seeking asylum represent 37% of total immigration when actually they accounted for only around 7% in the year ending in June 2024.
More than one in five (22%) thought asylum makes up more than half of the UK’s total immigration, according to the findings.
He said: “I think politicians need to be really careful about the language that they use.
“I accept that, you know, on issues like immigration, there are concerns across the country which need to be resolved. But I will never accept that that sort of disorder, that sort of violence is a way of settling any of those issues.
He later told the regional broadcaster: “What I said in relation to migration is it’s too high and needs to come down. I stand by that. I think we should be able to have a debate about that.
“This has got nothing to do with disorder. And I think anybody who’s conflating the two is making a huge mistake.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel