Sir Keir Starmer has insisted he is “completely in control” following a row within Government over his top adviser’s pay.
Disclosures that Sue Gray, the Prime Minister’s chief of staff, received a pay rise after the election which means she earns more than Sir Keir have sparked a row within Government and prompted opposition critics to demand answers about how the decision was made.
But Sir Keir would not be drawn into the row as he spoke to broadcasters before Labour’s party conference this weekend, only insisting his team was focused on his Government’s “big mandate to deliver change”.
The BBC said a number of Whitehall sources had briefed the organisation on Ms Gray’s salary increase, meaning she earns about £3,000 more than Sir Keir, who is paid about £167,000.
Sir Keir signed off a rebanding of the salaries for special advisers shortly after taking office in July, according to the BBC.
This is not reflected in the most recent publicly available report outlining special adviser salaries and pay bands, which is from July 2023.
The appointment of Ms Gray, a former senior civil servant whose report into lockdown-era parties within Downing Street contributed to the downfall of then-prime minister Boris Johnson, to Sir Keir’s team has been controversial.
The BBC report on her pay is the latest of a number of negative stories about the aide, and comes amid suggestions of mounting acrimony at the heart of the new Government over her earnings.
Downing Street denied this week that there was a “nest of vipers” behind the scenes in Sir Keir’s administration after reports of tensions involving senior officials, including between Ms Gray and director of political strategy Morgan McSweeney.
Asked in an interview before the Labour Party conference why chief of staff Sue Gray was getting paid more than him, the Prime Minister told BBC South East he was “not going to get into discussions about individual salaries about any members of my staff”.
Pressed on whether he had a grip on his team following briefings about Ms Gray, Sir Keir said: “I’m completely in control. I’m focused and every day the message from me to the team is exactly the same, which is we have to deliver.
“We were elected on a big mandate to deliver change, I am determined that we are going to do that.”
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds had earlier told Sky News ministers had “no political input” in the pay of their advisers, as he defended Sir Keir.
He said there was a “long-standing process” for determining earnings for aides and dismissed suggestions that the Prime Minister had personally intervened to increase Ms Gray’s pay.
The focus on the chief of staff’s pay comes at an awkward time for the PM as it swiftly follows another row about his and his wife’s acceptance of lavish gifts from prominent Labour donor and peer Lord Alli.
Speaking to broadcasters on Thursday, Mr Reynolds stuck to the line that he has “no problem” with ministers getting a “chance for a little bit of relaxation” as part of their jobs.
Sir Keir has accepted around £39,000 from Lord Alli since December 2019, as well as nearly £40,000 in tickets from the Premier League.
These included four Taylor Swift tickets during the election campaign worth £4,000 and thousands of pounds worth of tickets to Arsenal games.
The Prime Minister would not be drawn into details about his football seating arrangements when asked about the matter by BBC Yorkshire.
Sir Keir confirmed he was still a season ticket holder, but said “security advice” suggested he should not sit in the stands or risk “the taxpayer an absolute fortune to put I don’t know how many police officers in”.
The Prime Minister would not be drawn into revealing if he would instead be watching from a box, as it would “reinvent the same problem we’re trying to avoid”, adding: “But yes I’m not going to be in the stands anymore.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel