Construction group ISG, which was in the middle of numerous government projects including work to prisons, has collapsed into administration in the UK.
The majority of its 2,400 employees have been made redundant after the UK business appointed joint administrators at EY, and shut down its sites immediately.
The construction services company had been trying to find a buyer but failed to secure a suitable rescue deal, EY said.
A potential buyer “could not, despite repeated requests of them to do so, adequately demonstrate that they had the funding needed to recapitalise the business and keep it solvent”, it added.
“Due to current market conditions, an alternative sale or additional funding could not be secured.”
The London-based business employs about 2,400 people across its UK business, the majority of whom will be made redundant with immediate effect.
Around 200 employees will initially be kept on to assist the administrators in winding down the business.
ISG is involved in 69 central government projects totalling more than £1 billion, data analysts Barbour ABI said.
This incorporates 22 projects for the Ministry of Justice, including a £300 million extension to the Grendon and Springhill prisons in Buckinghamshire, and £155 million worth of work to expand three prisons in other locations, the data showed.
ISG has worked on other large projects including building and refurbishments of prisons, police and fire stations, schools and offices.
Barbour ABI’s chief analyst Ed Griffiths said the live projects were “just the tip of the iceberg” when it comes to ISG’s portfolio of contracts, adding: “The ripple effect will be extremely worrying for the hundreds of subcontractors involved.”
A spokesperson for the Government said: “We have implemented our detailed contingency plans and affected departments are working to ensure sites are safe and secure.”
ISG is an international company also operating across Europe and the Middle East.
Eight trading entities under the UK business, including its engineering and retail arms, have all been placed in administration.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel