LinkedIn has paused training generative AI models using data from UK users after engaging with the UK’s data protection regulator.
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said on Friday that it had received confirmation from the professional networking platform that it had “suspended” AI model training based on data from UK users.
On Thursday, it was reported that a policy update by the online giant noted that personal user data, including posts and articles on the site, could be used to train AI models and other tools as well as to better personalise services on LinkedIn.
But in a statement, Stephen Almond, executive director for regulatory risk at the ICO, said the regulator had raised concerns with LinkedIn about this, and that the company had now altered its approach.
“We are pleased that LinkedIn has reflected on the concerns we raised about its approach to training generative AI models with information relating to its UK users,” he said.
“We welcome LinkedIn’s confirmation that it has suspended such model training pending further engagement with the ICO.
“In order to get the most out of generative AI and the opportunities it brings, it is crucial that the public can trust that their privacy rights will be respected from the outset.
“We will continue to monitor major developers of generative AI, including Microsoft and LinkedIn, to review the safeguards they have put in place and ensure the information rights of UK users are protected.”
In a statement, a LinkedIn spokesperson said that as well as not enabling AI training in the European Economic Area, Switzerland and the UK, it was making an “opt out” setting available for users in other areas who did not want to have data used in the scheme.
“We believe that our members should have the ability to exercise control over their data, which is why we are making available an opt out setting for training AI models used for content generation in the countries where we do this,” the spokesperson said.
“We’ve always used some form of automation in LinkedIn products, and we’ve always been clear that users have the choice about how their data is used.
“The reality of where we’re at today is a lot of people are looking for help to get that first draft of that resume, to help write the summary on their LinkedIn profile, to help craft messages to recruiters to get that next career opportunity.
“At the end of the day, people want that edge in their careers and what our gen-AI services do is help give them that assist.
“At this time, we are not enabling training for generative AI on member data from the European Economic Area, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
“We welcome the opportunity to continue our constructive engagement with the ICO.”
Last week, social media giant Meta confirmed it would begin the training of its AI models using UK user data following a consultation with the ICO on the matter.
That announcement followed a similar stand-off with the ICO on the issue, but Meta said it had “engaged positively” with the regulator and said that it had now been given the green light on the scheme.
As part of its programme, the Facebook and Instagram parent firm said it would not use people’s private messages with friends and family to train AI, and that it does not use information from accounts of those in the UK under the age of 18.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here