The UK’s GP body has voted to oppose the use of physician associates (PAs) in doctor surgeries.
The governing council of the Royal College of GPs (RCGP) voted 61% in favour of opposing their role, citing patient safety grounds.
It comes after a survey of members for the college in June found 81% thought that negative effects on patient safety were one of the challenges of using PAs in general practice.
Half said they were aware of specific examples of patient safety being compromised, including PAs misdiagnosing people, inappropriate prescribing and lack of communication to patients and doctors.
PAs are graduates – usually with a health or life sciences degree – who have undertaken two years of postgraduate training.
They are supposed to support the work of doctors but hit the headlines after the death of Emily Chesterton, 30, in November 2022 from a pulmonary embolism. She was misdiagnosed by a PA on two occasions.
The British Medical Association (BMA) has also said its members are worried about the role of PAs and argues they should be stopped from diagnosing patients.
According to the NHS, PAs work under the supervision of a doctor and can diagnose people, take medical histories, perform physical examinations, see patients with long-term conditions, analyse test results and develop management plans.
Most associates work in GP surgeries, acute medicine and emergency medicine and there are NHS plans to extend their numbers.
The RCGP council voted on Friday in favour of opposing their use in general practice, with 31% against and 8% abstaining.
But the RCGP said that in recognition of the fact around 2,000 PAs already work in general practice, its council had approved three new sets of guidance to support GP practices employing PAs.
These covered the induction, supervision and scope of practice of PAs currently working in GP surgeries.
Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said: “The role of PAs in general practice has dominated the medical agenda for well over a year now and we understand the strength of feeling amongst our members and their concerns for the safety of their patients.
“It became very clear at today’s council discussion that we needed to speak out in opposition to the PA role within a general practice setting and I am pleased that our processes have enabled us to do this in a collegiate and democratic way.
“We recognise that this new policy position may be unsettling for physician associates who are already working in general practice and for their employers, and we hope that our upcoming documents to be published in the coming weeks will provide some clarity on how these roles could be managed where they are in place.”
Earlier this year, NHS England said PAs were “not substitutes” for GPs and must be supervised.
A letter to all GP surgeries, primary care network clinical directors, integrated care board chief executives and NHS England regional directors said PAs were “specifically trained to work collaboratively with doctors and others” and all work undertaken by PAs “must be supervised and debriefed with their supervising GP”.
It added: “All clinical and administrative/clerical staff (for example, receptionists) must be educated on the PA role and make it clear to patients that they are seeing a PA.
“As part of good governance processes, all staff should be aware of how to triage patients so that they are seen appropriately by a clinician working within their level of competence.”
Ms Chesterton died in 2022 after she visited her local GP practice in Crouch End, north London.
She had been under the impression that she was seeing a GP after being triaged by a practice receptionist.
The PA failed on both occasions to spot her leg pain and breathlessness was a blood clot, which ultimately travelled to her lungs.
Ms Chesterton was instead told she had anxiety.
A coroner later ruled she “should have been immediately referred to a hospital emergency unit” where she would likely have been treated for pulmonary embolism and would have survived.
Her parents, Brendan Chesterton, a retired maths and ICT teacher, and his wife Marion, 65, a retired languages teacher, have backed calls for much tighter controls over the work of PAs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel