South Carolina put inmate Freddie Owens to death on Friday as the state restarted executions after an unintended 13-year pause because prison officials could not get the drugs needed for lethal injections.
Owens was convicted of the 1997 killing of a Greenville convenience store clerk during a robbery.
While on trial, Owens killed a person incarcerated at a county jail.
His confession to that attack was read to two different juries and a judge, who all sentenced him to death.
Owens, 46, made no final statement.
His last meal was two cheeseburgers, french fries, well-done ribeye steak, six chicken wings, two strawberry sodas and a slice of apple pie.
When the curtain to the death chamber opened, Owens was strapped to a gurney, his arms stretched to his sides.
After the drug was administered, he said “bye” to his lawyer and she said “bye” to him.
He smiled slightly and his facial expression did not change much before he appeared to lose consciousness after about a minute.
Then his eyes closed and he took several deep breaths.
His breathing got shallower and his face twitched for another four or five minutes before the movements stopped.
A doctor came in and declared him dead a little more than 10 minutes later at 6.55pm.
Owens’ last-ditch appeals were repeatedly denied, including by a federal court on Friday morning.
Since the unintentional execution pause, South Carolina’s death row population has dwindled.
The state had 63 condemned people in early 2011. It now has 31 after Owens’ death on Friday.
About 20 people have been taken off death row and received different prison sentences after successful appeals. Others have died of natural causes.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel