Mohamed Al Fayed is alleged to be a serial sexual predator.
His sexual abuse, which has been under the spotlight for years, was not confined to his time as chairman of the luxury department store Harrods, according to lawyers for women who claim he assaulted them.
The late Mr Al Fayed was first accused of sexual abuse in the late 1980s, but the allegations did not lead to criminal charges.
On Friday, lawyer Bruce Drummond, who is representing some of the businessman’s alleged victims, said: “Reports of Al Fayed’s behaviour were made public as early as 1995.
“ITV aired a programme in 1997 covering matters. Publicists like Max Clifford thought it was funny and joked about it publicly.”
Here is a timeline of the allegations:
– 1995
Vanity Fair published an article aimed at exposing Mr Al Fayed’s behaviour.
He responded to it with a libel lawsuit, though he later agreed to drop the case as long as all the evidence the magazine had gathered in preparation for a trial was locked away.
A settlement was negotiated by a senior Harrods executive, the BBC reported.
– 1997
Four women on ITV’s The Big Story – in a programme entitled “Sex, Lies and Audiotape” – alleged that they were repeatedly groped, subjected to crude remarks and promised rewards in return for sex.
Mr Al Fayed reacted angrily to the allegations and issued a statement condemning the claims as outrageous and untrue, arguing that they were a repetition of allegations previously made in Vanity Fair magazine by disgruntled former employees.
Robert Loftus, a former Harrods security chief who claimed that Mr Al Fayed secretly but legally bugged employees, also appeared on the programme and alleged that the store owner did not care what he said to female staff.
In his statement, Mr Al Fayed said he was unable to comment in detail or contribute to the programme because he was not allowed to hear the allegations in advance and he questioned the motivation of the contributors to the programme.
– 2009
The Crown Prosecution Service, then led by Sir Keir Starmer, elected not to prosecute Mr Al Fayed following claims he had sexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl in Harrods.
He denied all allegations against him and attended a voluntary police interview.
– 2015
The Crown Prosecution Service again elect not to prosecute Mr Al Fayed after reviewing a file of evidence presented by the police because there was not “a realistic prospect of conviction”.
– 2018
The Crown Prosecution Service provides early investigative advice to the Metropolitan Police following allegations made against Mr Al Fayed.
However, a full file of evidence was never received by the Crown Prosecution Service in this instance – or for allegations made in 2021 and 2023 – and each of these cases is given no further action by police.
– July 2023
Harrods began settling claims with women who came forward with claims of sexual abuse at the hands of Mr Al Fayed.
– August 2023
Mohamed Al Fayed died on August 30 in London. He was aged 94.
– September 2024
A BBC special investigation revealed that more than 20 women alleged they had been sexual assaulted by Mr Al Fayed.
Five women alleged they had been raped by Mr Al Fayed, the broadcaster reported.
At a press conference on September 20, lawyer Gloria Allred said the “ugly truth” is that under Mr Al Fayed’s chairmanship, Harrods was “a toxic, unsafe and abusive environment”.
She added: “The allegations against Mohamed Al Fayed include serial rape, attempted rape, sexual battery and sexual abuse of minors.
“The allegations involve cover-ups, threats and a quarter century of sexual abuse by Mohamed Al Fayed after he purchased Harrods and became its chairman.”
Harrods’ current owners release a statement, in which they say they are “utterly appalled” by the allegations of abuse perpetrated by the late billionaire.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article