A 46-year-old man seen carrying a wooden stick on TV coverage of a counter-protest in Birmingham told police the item was a spiritual staff and was not an offensive weapon, a court has heard.
Shehraz Sarwar went on trial at Birmingham Magistrates’ Court on Monday, claiming he had a lawful excuse to carry the item during a protest in the Bordesley Green area which saw others wearing face coverings and balaclavas.
He has pleaded not guilty to possessing the stick as a weapon, but is said by the Crown to have carried it with the intention of causing injury on August 5.
Opening the case against Sarwar, of Wright Road, Saltley, Birmingham, prosecutor Shahid Rahman said: “At about 5pm a significant event unfolded with a number of people gathered outside a McDonald’s in Belchers Lane.
“There had been many (false) social media reports of the English Defence League attending the area. Many others gathered for a counter-protest reacting to the rumours.”
The court was told Sarwar was arrested after being identified from a Sky News bulletin, on which he was seen carrying what was initially and wrongly thought to be a sword.
Officers recovered the stick, which was examined by the district judge at his trial and estimated to be around 3ft long, the following day, after detaining him at his home.
Mr Rahman added: “He describes himself as a practising Muslim and said such staffs are used during Friday prayers led by the Imam.
“The Crown submission would be that the defendant had no credible reason for why he was carrying the item… that the defendant had no lawful reason to carry the item.”
The Crown do not suggest Sarwar was involved in any violent behaviour, but allege the stick was taken to a “demonstration whereby things could have become chaotic”.
Part of a 37-minute police interview, conducted on the evening of August 6, was read to the court, in which Sarwar said he was giving out water at the gathering.
The court heard he told police: “It was peaceful. I admit I was there. I never seen (any) disorder – I was not with anybody.
“I am no concern to nobody because I know how to behave. It’s not an offensive weapon – it’s a spiritual staff. I never had an intention of wrong.”
Sarwar, who told police he had personally cut the stick from a tree in Kashmir, added: “I have now come to realise that at this sort of situation it was not suitable, but it was not offensive.
“I never flaunted it at anybody. I was just there peacefully, just standing there.”
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article