Octopuses are usually considered to be solitary creatures, but new research suggests they might sometimes socialise with fish in order to share the responsibility of hunting.
The findings broaden our understanding of the shared social life of octopuses and fish, scientists say.
In the past, the animals have been seen to hunt together for shared prey such as molluscs and crustaceans.
The new study sheds more light on this, revealing that when hunting prey together, some octopus and fish species appear to share leadership.
However, it is not always a harmonious group hunt, with the scientists observing aggression among group members, including fish displacing others by darting towards them, and octopuses punching some fish to the outer areas of the group.
After analysing data from 120 hours of dives, the scientists found that leadership is shared for different types of decisions.
For example, goatfish specialised in deciding where the hunting pack moves — while the octopus decided whether and when the move would be made.
The authors note that although other types of mixed-species hunting is known – such as badger–coyote, mixed birds, and moray eel–grouper groups – they appear to be less flexible in using social information to change strategy compared to octopus–fish hunting groups.
Writing in the Nature Ecology and Evolution journal, the authors say: “These findings expand our current understanding of what leadership is and what sociality is.”
Eduardo Sampaio, from the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour in Germany, and colleagues tracked octopus–fish hunting packs during scuba diving expeditions in the Red Sea.
They saw 13 hunting groups consisting of one day octopus and different species of fish, including gold-saddle goatfish and blacktip groupers.
The researchers suggest that this joint effort leads to better success compared to the octopus or fish acting alone.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here