Tory leadership hopeful Robert Jenrick has said he wants to “get migration done”.
Mirroring the language that Boris Johnson used to describe Brexit, the former immigration minister told reporters after a fringe event at the Conservative Party’s conference that he wanted to “settle” migration so that leaders can address other issues.
He said that if he were Tory leader and the party came back to government, he would leave the European Convention on Human Rights as soon as possible without a referendum.
He said he did not accept that his stance on leaving the ECHR would split his party.
Mr Jenrick, who quit Rishi Sunak’s government after pushing for tougher measures over the Rwanda asylum scheme, is advocating for a cap on legal migration in the tens of thousands or fewer and for a stronger version of the Rwanda policy.
“If we have that cap, then we can stop talking about migration. I want to get migration done. This is a running sore in British politics.
“It’s important that we settle this by having serious answers to these challenges. Then we can talk about all the other issues that the public wants us to be discussing, like the economy and the NHS.”
Mr Jenrick is the frontrunner to take over from Mr Sunak as party leader.
He told supporters at a breakfast rally that the ECHR is a “leave or die” issue for the Tories.
“This is more than just ‘leave or amend’: frankly, our party doesn’t have a future unless we take a stand and fix this problem.
Immigration has so far featured heavily in the campaign leadership contest.
Kemi Badenoch, who is seen as Mr Jenrick’s closest rival, has been softer on the ECHR, saying that “if necessary” the UK should leave “international frameworks like the ECHR”.
Mr Jenrick told supporters on Monday: “It’s leave or remain. Remain means subject our people and our country to dangerous criminals on our streets, to terrorists on our streets, to a court creeping into every aspect of our lives without any democratic accountability, and it means that we never secure our borders.”
He called for the party conference to become the “crucible of conservatism”.
“Let’s use this opportunity to settle this issue once and for all, and for our party to have the answer to one of the biggest challenges facing our country.
“Let’s leave the ECHR and let’s get this done.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel