First Minister John Swinney will not order an investigation into his predecessor’s conduct when his parents-in-law were trapped in Gaza.
Senior Tory MSP Stephen Kerr called for the probe on Monday after reports emerged claiming Humza Yousaf lobbied the UK Government to help Elizabeth and Maged El-Nakla – his wife’s parents – escape from the territory.
The couple had been visiting family in the region when Hamas launched their attack on Israel on October 7, prompting long-running Israeli reprisals, with concerns a wider war in the Middle East could be sparked.
But speaking to the PA news agency in Perth on Monday, the First Minister said he would not order an investigation into Mr Yousaf, describing the former first minister’s actions as the “normal routine business of government”.
“I think what’s important is to focus on the central point in this whole story, which is about the fact that we had citizens from this country who were trapped in Gaza, in an awful conflict and they had to be supported to be brought home,” he said.
Asked specifically if he would order a probe under the ministerial code, Mr Swinney said: “I have no intention of doing so.”
The First Minister likened the actions of Mr Yousaf to that of his own government in response to the ongoing hostilities in Lebanon.
“We have been in touch with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) on that question about Lebanon, as members of the public would expect me to be, as they would expect my predecessor to be in touch on the Gaza situation,” he said.
“So this is the normal routine business of government, where your citizens are held in a difficult situation of conflict that you do your best to get them out.”
The former first minister has also tersely rejected the accusations of wrongdoing, saying on X, formerly Twitter: “They can try all the smears they want, but they won’t stop me from talking about the atrocities facing the people of Gaza & Lebanon.
“As the FOIs show, not a single request was ever made by me for preferential treatment for my in-laws. They left alongside other British nationals.”
Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph newspaper, Mr Kerr, who served on the Scottish Parliament’s Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee until earlier this year, said, while Mr Yousaf’s “motives” should not be questioned, “we have every right to question his methods”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here