The UK has more international private jet flights to European holiday hotspots than any other country, according to a new study.
Environmental charity Greenpeace, which commissioned the research, urged the Government to ban the aircraft as their carbon emissions are contributing to a “climate crisis” featuring “deadly floods and heatwaves”.
The report looked at private jet flights to 45 European airports near popular destinations last year.
Some 12,702 out of the total of 117,965 were from the UK. This 10.8% share was larger than any other country.
France was in second place at 10.7%, followed by Italy with 8.9%.
The analysis, conducted by Germany-based T3 Transportation Think Tank, found a spike in private aircraft traffic during the summer, indicating the jets are often being used for holidays rather than business.
The most common destination included in the analysis for private jet flights from the UK last year was Nice in the south of France (2,642 flights).
That was followed by Geneva, Switzerland (1,953 flights); Palma de Mallorca, Spain (1,140 flights); and Malaga, Spain (1,015 flights).
Hiring a private jet generally costs several times the price of a seat on a regular commercial aircraft.
Benefits generally include quicker security and border checks, enhanced onboard service and more control over take off and landing times.
The thousands of flights originating in the UK last year caused around 67,000 tonnes of CO2, according to the analysis, even without taking account of return journeys.
Greenpeace UK climate campaigner Georgia Whittaker said: “While the super-rich take their private jets to their yachts and mansions on the French Riviera, people on the ground keep feeling the impacts of deadly floods and heatwaves fuelled disproportionately by the wealthy.
“This absurd level of private luxury for the few is helping to create a public disaster for the many. We can’t go on like this.
“To tackle both growing inequalities and the climate crisis, the UK Government should ban polluting private jets and impose a wealth tax on the super rich.
“The extra revenue from that could fund measures that would both cut planet-heating emissions and make transport and energy bills cheaper for ordinary people.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here