Passengers using London’s Euston railway station are being put “in danger” by “high levels of overcrowding”, a transport watchdog has warned.
London TravelWatch said in a statement that “last-minute announcements” mean passengers “rush to platforms”, and staff “appear overwhelmed by the sheer numbers of people”.
Network Rail, which owns the station, has been criticised for converting the main departure board in Euston’s concourse into a large advertising screen, with smaller train information boards installed.
On September 26 last year regulator the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) issued an improvement notice to Network Rail in relation to the station, accusing the Government-owned company of failing to prevent safety risks from “unacceptable” overcrowding.
The ORR found Network Rail “complied” with the notice on December 15 by implementing measures to “manage passenger traffic flows and overcrowding”, but concerns about the station continue to be raised.
London TravelWatch said: “Even on good days, the passenger experience at London Euston fails to match its importance as the capital’s main rail gateway to four of the UK’s largest cities.
“But it is when train services are disrupted that the station really struggles to cope, with high levels of overcrowding putting passengers in danger.
“London TravelWatch has met with Network Rail regarding these issues, yet passengers are still having to rush to platforms due to last minute announcements, staff appear overwhelmed by the sheer numbers of people involved and the recently-installed information screens seem to have done little if anything to make things better for passengers when services are disrupted.
“It is almost a year since the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) issued an improvement notice to Network Rail regarding the station, but it seems little has changed.”
In May, Network Rail chief executive Andrew Haines wrote to then-chair of the Commons’ Transport Select Committee Iain Stewart outlining steps taken since September 2023 to improve safety at Euston, such as installing signs asking people not to run, and ensuring ramps to platforms are clear of passengers before announcing the next departure from the same platform.
But he acknowledged the experience of passengers “isn’t where we want it to be, particularly during disruption and other busy periods”.
He added: “We are a learning organisation and we will continue to work closely with operators to better manage both the safety and customer experience within the current station footprint, particularly as we look to deliver major improvements in the future.”
There are plans to redevelop Euston, including a larger concourse, but these are subject to Network Rail securing more Government funding.
Major work to prepare a site alongside the station for HS2 was halted by the Conservative government in March last year.
Labour ministers have yet to announce whether the high-speed railway will be extended to Euston, or will only run to and from Old Oak Common in the west London suburbs.
A Network Rail spokesperson said: “Euston was designed for a different era and we acknowledge that it is in need of major investment and modernisation.
“However, safety is at the heart of our operation and something we would never compromise on in any of our stations.
“For the majority of the time the station works, however during times of disruption, there simply isn’t enough room for passengers and we know this can make for an uncomfortable and unpleasant environment.”
An ORR spokesperson said: “Our improvement notice last year required Network Rail to improve their risk assessments and processes in relation to crowding at Euston.
“Notwithstanding, the passenger experience at Euston remains uncomfortable at times for users and we are aware of the recent media coverage on this.
“We have been continuing to talk with Network Rail about further improvements it can make to help manage crowds, particularly during disruption.”
Meanwhile, questions have been raised about Lord Hendy’s position as rail minister due to his conduct in a previous role as Network Rail chairman.
It emerged in August that railway engineer Gareth Dennis was sacked by transport consultancy Systra UK after describing Euston as “unsafe” in a media interview.
In his Network Rail role, Lord Hendy sent a letter to Systra chief executive Nick Salt in relation to the comment.
He asked Mr Salt “what action are you taking?”, adding: “Finding a potential supplier criticising a possible client reflects adversely on your likelihood of doing business with us or our supply chain.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel