First Minister John Swinney has not ruled out a snap election in Scotland if his budget fails to secure enough support to pass in Holyrood.
The SNP currently runs Scotland as a minority administration, needing just two votes from opposition MSPs to pass legislation.
But the Scottish Government’s budget this year – a draft of which will be published in December – is expected to require swingeing cuts to be made to public spending in response to financial pressures.
In recent years, the Scottish Greens have been relied upon to provide the necessary votes – in exchange for policy compromises – first as a sympathetic opposition party and latterly as a coalition partner.
But the relationship between the two parties has soured somewhat since the breakdown of the Bute House Agreement earlier this year and a series of policy shifts in the Scottish Government, meaning the Greens are no longer the certain partner ministers have come to know.
If the Scottish Government fails to pass its budget, it could spark a chain of events which will lead to an early Holyrood election – although it is unlikely political parties would want to go to the polls for fear of public backlash.
But appearing on the BBC’s Political Thinking podcast, the First Minister was asked if failing to pass his tax and spending plans would trigger a vote.
“It depends on the actions of other political parties,” he said.
The budget, he added, will be “sustainable” and will balance the books in Scotland.
But he continued: “You need 65 votes to pass a budget, we don’t have that number of votes in our party, so we’ve got to get others to vote for us.
“So we’ll work to create a set of propositions that will command support, but that puts as much emphasis on other political parties and what they’re prepared to support.”
The public know there will be a vote in 2026, Mr Swinney said, “but what I think they expect politicians to do in the interim is to get on with taking the decision to govern”.
Asked if his comments were a message to the Greens, Mr Swinney replied: “I think it’s a message to everybody, because there’s no hiding place for any political party.
“If we don’t have a budget in place on April 1, hospitals can’t get their budgets, schools can’t get their budgets, benefits can’t be paid, all sorts of things like that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here