The Scottish Government has been accused of ignoring the needs of those who use and work in social care by continuing to move ahead with its plans for a National Care Service, despite unions and local authorities pulling their support.
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said ministers are launching a “power grab” on the sector that will take control away from local communities.
The criticism comes after a report revealed a large drop in the number of people satisfied with the social care system in Scotland.
The Health and Care Experience Survey found the proportion of service users who feel the system has improved or maintained their quality of life dropped from 80% in 2015/16 to 53% this year.
Researchers at Public Health Scotland also reported the number of Scots who rate their overall help, care or support as “excellent” or “good” decreased from 82% to 63%.
Those who feel they are supported to live independently fell to 65% compared to 85% nine years ago.
The survey also found the number of service users who think they have a say in their care plummeted from 80% to 53%, while those who feel safe decreased from 85% to 66%.
The Scottish Government has come under pressure from opposition parties to either scrap or pause the National Care Service Bill, which is currently going through Parliament.
The plans – which would centralise adult social care and social work into a single body ultimately accountable to ministers – has been beset by delays and uncertainty over costs since it was announced.
Health Secretary Neil Gray has vowed to “complete the job” despite local authority umbrella body Cosla and unions withdrawing their support for it.
Mr Cole-Hamilton said it “couldn’t be clearer” that the entire Scottish care system is “in crisis”.
He added: “Staff have been let down and service users are telling us how badly it is impacting upon them.
“The SNP’s only answer is an ill-fated power grab that would wrench away control from local communities and completely fail to tackle the core problems in social care.
“My party is the only one that has opposed this legislation from day one. We’ve now been joined by the unions representing frontline staff and councils.
“They can all see that waiting for the wrong solution in 2029 isn’t going to fix the care crisis that thousands of families are struggling with right now.”
He described the National Care Service as “billion-pound bureaucracy that no-one wants”.
He added: “We can’t begin to fix the care crisis until the Scottish Government admits their pricey power grab is doomed.
“They must drop it and put the money into frontline services and staff instead.”
Social care minister Maree Todd said: “Creating the National Care Service is about improving people’s lives and ensuring consistency of care across Scotland. These statistics provide more evidence that the social care system in Scotland needs fundamental reform.
“That is why it is essential we establish a National Care Service that will improve people’s lives and quality of care, while ensuring those who deliver vital services feel supported.
“We remain open to working constructively with local government through continued progress on the National Care Service Bill. We should all want to address the concerns of people who use community health and social care and the staff who provide it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here