David Lammy will face questions from MPs angry about the decision to give up sovereignty over the Chagos Islands, later on Monday.
The Foreign Secretary’s appearance in the Commons comes as No 10 said the decision should not be viewed as a signal of movement on other disputed territories, including the Falkland Islands and Gibraltar.
Mr Lammy will update Parliament on the announcement about the islands, known as the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT), which was made while the Commons was not sitting during the break for party conferences.
Downing Street said the deal to give up sovereignty over the BIOT was because of the “unsustainable” legal position and had no impact on other sovereignty disputes.
The International Court of Justice ruled the UK’s administration of the Indian Ocean territory was “unlawful” and must end, a judgment backed by a United Nations vote in 2019.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman would not be drawn on the cost to the UK taxpayer of the deal, in which Mauritius will be given sovereignty over the islands, with a 99-year agreement, to secure the strategically important UK-US military base on Diego Garcia.
The spokesman said: “The Government inherited a situation where the long-term secure operation of the military base at Diego Garcia was under threat with contested sovereignty and legal challenges, including through various international courts and tribunals.
“You will be aware that the previous government initiated sovereignty negotiations in 2022 and conducted a number of rounds of negotiations.
“This Government picked up those negotiations and has reached an agreement, which means that for the first time in over 50 years, the base will be undisputed, legally secure, with full Mauritian backing.”
Asked why the BIOT should not be seen as a precedent for other sovereignty disputes such as the Falklands and Gibraltar, the spokesman said: “It’s a unique situation based on its unique history and circumstances, and has no bearing on other overseas territories.”
The spokesman added: “British sovereignty of the Falkland Islands or Gibraltar is not up for negotiation.”
Shadow foreign secretary Andrew Mitchell has described the agreement as a “bad deal for Britain”.
He told Sky News’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme: “This is definitely, from what we have seen, not the deal the last Conservative government would have done.”
He added: “We need to know about what protection there is against Chinese encroachment into the archipelago, we need to know what money is being provided by the British taxpayer. We need to probe the terms of the lease.”
The International Court of Justice had previously ruled the UK’s administration of the Indian Ocean territory was “unlawful” and must end, a judgment backed by a United Nations vote in 2019.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here