PepsiCo has lowered its organic revenue forecast for the year after US consumers continued to buy fewer of its snacks and drinks.
The company, based in Purchase, New York, said on Tuesday it now expects its organic revenue -which is adjusted for foreign currency exchanges and the impact of product acquisitions or divestments – to increase in the low single-digit range for the year. It had expected an increase of 4%.
PepsiCo said its performance in North America was “subdued”, hit by a big recall of its Quaker Oats granola bars and cereals as well as weak demand for its Frito-Lay snacks and drinks.
Frito-Lay North America’s sales volumes slipped 1.5%, while North American beverage volumes fell 3%.
Consumers began to reject paying higher prices in the summer after years of increases, and PepsiCo vowed to lower the cost of some products like potato crisps and tortilla chips.
Revenue was flat in the third quarter, at 23.3 billion US dollars (£17.8 billion). Wall Street had expected revenue of 23.8 billion dollars (£18.2 billion), according to analysts polled by FactSet.
Net income fell 5% to 2.9 billion dollars (£2.2 billion), or 2.13 dollars (£1.63) per share – also short of analysts’ forecasts of 2.28 dollars (£1.74).
PepsiCo shares fell 1% in premarket trading on Tuesday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here