A widely shared social media post claimed that the Home Secretary “won’t do her job” and that led Reform UK to bring a private prosecution “to ensure justice is served” on two men who were involved in an altercation with police at Manchester Airport.
Evaluation
Decisions to prosecute are taken by the Crown Prosecution Service, not the Home Secretary. Greater Manchester Police has said that it is awaiting a charging decision from the CPS after handing over evidence in mid-August.
The facts
On the evening of July 23 2024 three incidents took place in a terminal at Manchester Airport. One of the incidents, Greater Manchester Police (GMP) reported, “resulted in the three officers receiving head injuries, including a broken nose”.
GMP also revealed that the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) was investigating the use of force by its officers, after footage was spread on social media.
On October 7 an update from the police said that: “Following an investigation led by the GMP Major Incident Team, a comprehensive file of evidence was sent to the CPS in mid-August, and we await a charging decision.”
GMP added: “We continue to support the officers involved and are committed to getting them justice.”
On the same day Reform UK announced that “if the CPS will not charge the assailants, we will organise a private criminal prosecution against them”. The Party’s MPs also wrote a letter outlining their concerns about the case to the Home Secretary.
It is up to the Crown Prosecution Service, not the Home Secretary, to decide who gets prosecuted. These decisions are made independently of Government.
The CPS is scrutinised by the Attorney General, however the AG is not involved in decisions that the CPS takes “in the vast majority” of cases. The CPS does not report to the Home Office.
Links
GMP – GMP opens Public Portal in appeal for further information about events leading up to footage filmed in Manchester Airport Terminal Two (archived)
GMP – Statement on Manchester Airport incident (archived from cached version)
UK Parliament – Solicitor General, Volume 753: debated on Thursday 12 September 2024 (archived)
Crown Prosecution Service – About CPS (archived)
CPS – Prosecuting in the public interest: independence without isolation – Max Hill QC, Director of Public Prosecutions (archived)
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel