The government said its Employment Rights Bill is being unveiled against a backdrop of it inheriting a “battered” economy from the Conservatives, who ministers accused of presiding over “strike Britain”.
More than twice as many days were lost to industrial action than France under Rishi Sunak’s premiership, said Labour, following more than two years of strikes by hundreds of thousands of workers including nurses, teachers, junior doctors, train drivers and barristers.
Labour said new analysis showed that the Tories’ “scorched-earth” approach to strikes over the last two years cost the economy £3.3 billion in lost productivity, including £1.7 billion from NHS industrial action alone.
If the trend continued for another term of Conservative government, the UK would have been projected to lose 13.5 million working days, costing the economy just under £5 billion in lost productivity, said Labour.
Under Rishi Sunak’s premiership the UK lost on average just under three million working days a year to industrial action, twice as many a year as France, said Labour.
Overall since May 2010 the UK lost 9,873,000 days to strike action, while from 2016 to 2022, the number of hours lost to strikes increased more than sevenfold, with the number of stoppages in 2022 hitting a 30-year high.
In 2022, the UK had 65 times more days lost to strike than Sweden, 11 times more than Germany and twice as many as Spain, the government added.
Soon after winning the general election in July, the government resolved long-running disputes involving junior doctors and train drivers.
The government added that industrial action during the 14 years of the Conservatives cost the UK economy £3,307,455,000 in lost output and £1,207,221,075 in lost taxes for HMRC.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here