The UK has fallen further behind the United States in a league table of the countries that educate the most serving world leaders who studied abroad.
Of the current serving presidents, prime ministers and monarchs educated at a university outside their own home country, 70 received higher education in the US compared to 58 in the UK.
The gap between the US and the UK is the largest it has been since the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) think tank first launched the annual “soft-power index” in 2017.
Nick Hillman, director of Hepi, has warned that the gap between these two countries could widen further in future years because of the former UK Government’s immigration policies affecting international students.
He told the PA news agency: “We have sowed the seeds for our own further relative decline and we have done it knowingly.”
The UK topped the think tank’s first rankings in 2017, but the US overtook Britain in the subsequent year and it has maintained the lead ever since.
Over the past year, the number of world leaders educated in the US increased from 65 to 70 – the biggest one-year increase – while the number educated in the UK remained the same.
The study of 195 countries and their senior leaders, carried out in August, shows that France is still in third place in the index despite educating fewer world leaders than last year (28 in total).
The think tank has suggested that the number of world leaders educated in other countries than their own is a useful proxy for the amount of “soft power” held by different countries
Mr Hillman said: “As a firm believer in the benefits of studying abroad, I am sorry to see the UK’s relative position slip – and for the sixth time since we began calculating the numbers seven years ago.
“What could once have been excused as a blip is now a very clear trend.
“International students bring all sorts of financial, educational and social benefits to the UK but the constant flux in policy, such as the tighter rules introduced in January 2024, has confused people about whether the UK is truly welcoming.
“So, we cannot assume that we will recover the ground we have lost relative to the US.
“I hope the new UK Government, which immediately adopted much more positive rhetoric on international students, will bear Hepi’s soft-power index in mind as they continue evaluating whether the current student migration rules and high visa costs are fit for purpose.”
A spokesperson for Universities UK (UUK) said: “Our universities are world renowned for their high quality of teaching and research and UK universities remain a top destination for some of the world’s most powerful people.
“These figures are a reminder of the important role our universities play in exporting British values around the world, vital at a time of increased global insecurity, underscoring why it is imperative that they are funded sustainably now for the future.”
A Government spokesman said: “We will create a secure future for our universities as engines of growth and opportunity so they can deliver for students, local communities and the economy.
“The UK remains a world leading provider of higher education and we take pride in our world-class universities, who reach and empower millions of students globally with high quality education.
“International students enrich our university campuses, and we want to attract those who meet the requirements to study here, but it is also essential to strike a balance with reducing overall migration levels.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here