Banking giant HSBC is reportedly planning a round of cuts among senior managers under plans to save up to 300 million US dollars (£229 million).
New boss Georges Elhedery is said to be considering a merger of its commercial banking division with the investment banking arm as he puts his stamp on the business since taking over as chief executive last month, according to the Financial Times.
It is understood the merger would see roles axed among its high-paid top bankers across the two divisions, with an announcement expected by the end of the month.
HSBC was not immediately available to comment.
The group has already seen a shake-up of its senior management, which was announced days before former chief financial officer Mr Elhedery took on the top job on September 2.
This saw Barry O’Byrne, formerly chief executive of its global commercial banking arm, move across to head up global wealth and personal banking, with no direct replacement yet appointed.
The reported merger plans would allow it to strip out roles that are duplicated across the two divisions.
But the savings it is said to be targeting would be a fraction of group costs, which hit 16.3 billion dollars (£12.5 billion) in the first half of 2024 after rising 5% year on year.
At the time of the bank’s half-year results in July, Mr Elhedery insisted he was not planning any major strategy overhaul, but said he would speed up plans already in place.
HSBC has previously attempted to combine parts of the back office operations of commercial and investment banking, but the plans were halted due to the pandemic.
The bank reported better-than-expected pre-tax profits of 21.6 billion dollars (£16.5 billion) for the first half of 2024, largely stable on the mammoth 21.7 billion dollars (£16.6 billion) haul it made a year earlier.
Its second-quarter results beat expectations, with profits defying forecasts of a fall by rising 1%, helping it unveil another 3 billion dollars (£2.3 billion) in share buybacks.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here