Joey Barton “needs to find himself a different hobby”, Jeremy Vine has said after the former football manager was accused of “undermining” a libel settlement with the broadcaster.
Vine sued Barton for libel and harassment over nine online posts, including where he falsely called the BBC Radio 2 presenter a “big bike nonce” on X, formerly Twitter.
The pair settled the claim after Barton posted two apologies on the same social media platform and paid a total of £110,000 damages to Vine, as well as his legal costs.
At the High Court on Friday, Gervase de Wilde, representing Vine, who was present in court, said in an agreed statement that Barton now recognises that he made a “very serious” and “untrue” allegation.
But Vine’s barrister later referenced a post recently made on X by Barton, where Vine can be seen dancing and walking about an office in a pair of high-heeled shoes.
Mr de Wilde asked a judge to warn Barton about the risk of contempt of court, which can be punished with up to two years in prison.
Alongside the video of Vine, posted approximately six hours before the hearing, Barton posted the caption “Perfectly normal. Nothing to see here” alongside several emojis, including a cyclist and a rainbow.
Speaking outside court, Vine said: “Joey Barton has probably lost himself £450,00 with nine tweets so he needs to find himself a different hobby.”
Mr de Wilde told the hearing that the post “negates the vindication of a statement” being read, adding: “He is undermining the settlement he has reached with Mr Vine and further infringing his rights.”
The barrister said that Barton had made four undertakings, including not to harass Vine or encourage others to do so.
Mr de Wilde said: “The conduct this morning has gone right up to the line and in Mr Vine’s view, it has gone across the line.”
Mrs Justice Steyn said: “It does seem to me in light of the letter from the claimant’s solicitors … that it is sensible to give the warning that Mr Barton would have received if he had given the undertakings in court.
“These are all serious commitments he has given to the court and any breach of them is potentially punishable as a contempt of court.”
In the statement, Mr de Wilde said Vine “was deeply alarmed, distressed and upset by the defendant’s conduct” which included a “persistent and highly damaging campaign of defamation, harassment and misuse of private information”.
Enfys Jenkins, for Barton, said in the statement that the former football player “accepts everything said on the claimant’s behalf”.
She added: “The defendant wishes to apologise for the distress his publications caused.”
Ms Jenkins later said she had not spoken to her client about the recent video post.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article