A retired High Court judge has said that Parkinson’s sufferers are being left out of the debate for a new assisted dying law.
Sir Nicholas Mostyn has argued that because people with the neurodegenerative disease are not terminally ill, they would not be covered by any change to the law.
The 67-year-old co-presenter of the Movers and Shakers podcast, which focuses on issues surrounding Parkinson’s, told the show in a forthcoming episode: “Parkies will never get a terminal diagnosis, so this bill is no f***ing use to us at all.
”In Spain, Parkinson’s is one of the most common reasons for seeking assisted death. We are going to be left on the beach here. There is a cohort of people like us who it is not going to help and we are left with the existing, most unsatisfactory law.”
The comments, as reported in the Sunday Times, come as a Bill to give choice at the end of life is set to come before Parliament for the first time in almost a decade.
MPs will be able to make their opinions known in the Commons on the controversial subject when they debate the bill on choice at the end of life for people with terminal illness on November 29.
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater’s private member’s bill (PMB) is due to be formally introduced in Parliament on Wednesday.
A new study by the Policy Institute and the Complex Life and Death Decisions group at King’s College London (KCL) found that a fifth (20%) of people asked said they did not want assisted dying to be legalised in the next five years while 63% said they did.
Co-host Mark Mardell, a former BBC presenter who was diagnosed with Parkinson’s in 2022, added: ”I think it’s everybody’s right to kill themselves, and that we shouldn’t listen to our western Christian heritage, be more like the Romans and Japanese, perhaps, and respect those who want to kill themselves.
“For me the problem is the only time I would want to die is when I couldn’t bear it any more and couldn’t make the decision. I abhor suicide as someone who finds life very sweet.
“Even as the lens gets narrower, I want to continue living, but I don’t know how you draw that distinction and stop people killing themselves from depression but still allow people with Parkinson’s.”
Co-presenter Gillian Lacey-Solymar, who was diagnosed 12 years ago, said that a six-month life expectancy rule would not cover the symptoms of Parkinson’s.
She said: “Let’s look at how bad something like Parkinson’s can get – say you are doubly incontinent, you can’t speak any more, you are in pain, you can’t move.
“What is the point in living? What terrifies me is the years ahead of this awful vegetative state that does happen to a lot of people with Parkinson’s.”
However Labour peer and former chancellor Lord Falconer, who withdrew his own assisted dying bill last week, said that there should be safeguards put in place within any new law.
The 72-year-old explained: “I am strongly of the view the state should not be providing assistance to people to take their own life unless they are dying imminently.
”If you allow the state to provide assistance when you are not terminally ill but depending upon unbearable suffering, the lines of what is appropriate become very difficult to draw.
“For example, people suffering from unendurable mental agony, perhaps in their mid-30s, should the state be providing assistance for them to end their lives?
“There need to be safeguards to prevent you being either over-persuaded, or doing it when you are not of sound mind. This is not a euthanasia bill.”
The Movers and Shakers episode discussing the issue will be released on Saturday, October 19.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel