SpaceX has pulled off its boldest test flight yet of the enormous Starship rocket, catching the returning booster back at the launch pad with mechanical arms.
A jubilant Elon Musk called it “science fiction without the fiction part”.
Towering almost 400 feet, the empty Starship blasted off at sunrise from the southern tip of Texas near the Mexican border.
It arced over the Gulf of Mexico like the four Starships before it that ended up being destroyed, either soon after lift-off or while ditching into the sea.
The last one in June was the most successful yet, completing its flight without exploding.
This time, SpaceX founder and chief executive Elon Musk upped the challenge and risk.
The company brought the first-stage booster back to land at the pad from which it had soared seven minutes earlier. The launch tower sported monstrous metal arms, dubbed chopsticks, that caught the descending 232-ft booster.
“The tower has caught the rocket!!” Mr Musk said via X. “Big step towards making life multiplanetary was made today.”
Company employees screamed in joy as the booster slowly lowered itself into the launch tower’s arms.
Nasa joined in the celebration, with administrator Bill Nelson sending congratulations.
“Even in this day and age, what we just saw is magic,” SpaceX’s Dan Huot observed from near the launch site. “I am shaking right now.”
“This is a day for the engineering history books,” added SpaceX’s Kate Tice, from SpaceX headquarters in Hawthorne, California.
An hour later, the empty spacecraft that was launched atop the booster made a controlled landing in the Indian Ocean as planned, adding to the day’s success.
It was up to the flight director to decide, in real-time with manual control, whether to attempt the landing.
SpaceX said both the booster and launch tower had to be in a good, stable condition. Otherwise, it was going to end up in the gulf like the previous ones. Everything was judged to be ready for the catch.
The retro-looking stainless steel spacecraft on top continued around the world once free of the booster. Cameras on a buoy in the Indian Ocean showed flames shooting up from the water as the booster impacted precisely at the targeted spot. It was not meant to be recovered for this demonstration.
“What a day,” Mr Huot said. “Let’s get ready for the next one.”
The June flight came up short at the end after pieces came off. SpaceX upgraded the software and reworked the heat shield, improving the thermal tiles.
SpaceX has been recovering the first-stage boosters of its smaller Falcon 9 rockets for nine years, after delivering satellites and crews to orbit from Florida or California. But they land on floating ocean platforms or on concrete slabs several miles from their launch pads – not on them.
Recycling Falcon boosters has sped up the launch rate and saved SpaceX millions.
Mr Musk intends to do the same for Starship, the biggest and most powerful rocket ever built with 33 methane-fuel engines on the booster alone.
Nasa has ordered two Starships to land astronauts on the moon later this decade.
SpaceX intends to use Starship to send people and supplies to the moon and, eventually, Mars.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel