Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been criticised for buying a multimillion-dollar waterfront home during a national housing crisis with elections just months away.
Critics argue that the purchase of the 4.3 million Australian dollar (£2.2 million) clifftop home at Copacabana, north of his hometown of Sydney, made him appear out of touch with many Australians who are struggling to buy or rent a home due to elevated interest rates, rising prices and limited supply.
Mr Albanese brushed off criticisms when questioned by reporters on Wednesday about concerns raised privately within his own government.
“We want to get on with helping Australians, whether it be public housing, whether it be rentals or whether it be buying their own homes,” Mr Albanese said.
Copacabana and several other beaches in the area have mainly multi-million dollar price tags on their waterfront homes, owned by Sydney-siders who still have homes in the city or have moved to a more tranquil lifestyle.
Opposition lawmaker Sussan Ley described the purchase as evidence that Mr Albanese was “out of touch,” and her colleague Angie Bell described the timing as “questionable”.
“The real issue for Australians is a lot of people want to be able to buy a home, but they’re finding it very, very difficult and the current government is doing a very poor job at getting the policy settings in place to make it easier,” opposition lawmaker Paul Fletcher told Sky News Australia.
But Government legislators have publicly backed Mr Albanese.
“I think the average Australian says, ‘Fair enough, leave him alone, I’ll criticise his policies or I’ll support his policies, I’ll criticise or support his government, but I’m not going to criticise or support what he does with his own bank account with his own money,’” Cabinet minister Chris Bowen told Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Mr Albanese’s centre-left Labour Party seeks a second three-year term in office at elections due by May next year.
Monash University political scientist Zareh Ghazarian described the buy as “politically risky” ahead of an election in which housing affordability will be “at the top of the policy agenda”.
“For the prime minister to make this purchase in this climate is just distracting for the Labour Party,” Mr Ghazarian said.
Mr Ghazarian said the home also damaged Mr Albanese’s political brand.
Mr Albanese, who is paid an annual salary exceeding 600,000 Australian dollars (£308,000), maintains that being raised in public housing by a single mom gave him an appreciation of the financial struggles of low-income families.
A Sydney radio station first reported the real estate transaction on Tuesday.
Mr Albanese’s offer for the four-bedroom house was made in September and the sale was expected to be completed by the end of October.
On Tuesday, Mr Albanese explained he was buying the house because the family of his fiancee, Jodie Haydon, lived on the Central Coast.
Mr Albanese lives in the prime minister’s official residences in Sydney and the national capital Canberra.
He said he was selling his private Sydney house which would help pay for the Copacabana home.
“I am much better off as prime minister. I earn a good income. I understand that. I understand that I’ve been fortunate,” Mr Albanese said.
“But I also know what it’s like to struggle. My mum lived in the one public housing that she was born in for all of her 65 years.
“And I know what it’s like, which is why I want to help all Australians into a home, whether it be public homes or private rentals or home ownership.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel