During Prime Minister’s Questions on October 16, Sir Keir Starmer was asked a question by a fellow Labour MP about cycles of poverty.
To begin his answer, the Prime Minister said: “The party opposite – they want to get rid of maternity pay, but keep hereditary peers. It’s the same old Tories.”
Evaluation
A row erupted at the recent Conservative Party Conference over prospective leader Kemi Badenoch’s position on maternity pay.
However, Ms Badenoch’s comments were framed more generally around workplace regulations being “excessive” rather than this specific kind of payment.
The Conservative Party, which has not yet decided who will be its leader, has not adopted a policy to scrap maternity pay.
The facts
Maternity pay was established in British law under the Employment Protection Act 1975, passed by Harold Wilson’s Labour government, building on a Maternity Allowance introduced in 1948 (under Labour’s Clement Attlee) and the right to maternity leave as originally granted in 1933 (under Ramsay MacDonald, also Labour).
Statutory Maternity Pay (SMP) was then established in 1987, under Tory Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and has been expanded under successive governments.
On September 29 this year, Ms Badenoch – running to be leader of the Conservative Party – was being interviewed by Times Radio, where she said SMP “is a function of tax, tax comes from people who are working – we’re taking from one group of people and giving to another. This, in my view, is excessive.”
Pushed on whether this meant she thought maternity pay was excessive, Ms Badenoch replied: “I think it’s gone too far the other way in terms of general business regulation.” She added that the exact amount paid in SMP was “neither here nor there”.
Later on social media site X, formerly Twitter, she clarified: “Of course I believe in maternity pay.” Ms Badenoch also wrote that maternity pay “isn’t excessive”.
The No 10 press office has been contacted for comment.
Links
UK Parliament – Oral Answers to Questions Debated on Wednesday October 16 2024 (archived)
Employment Protection Act 1975, Part II, Section 36 – legislation.gov.uk (archived)
Maternity Allowance background (archived)
Maternity Pay in the UK | Croner (archived)
House of Commons Library: Maternity pay and leave (archived)
Kemi Badenoch post on X with Times Radio interview clip (archived post and video)
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel