The Cabinet is united on the Government’s spending plans, Rachel Reeves has insisted amid reports of arguments over the upcoming Budget.
The Chancellor was reportedly locked in negotiations with some ministers until last week as she sought £40 billion of tax rises and spending cuts ahead of the announcement on October 30.
Speaking to the PA news agency, Ms Reeves said the final settlements had been confirmed but acknowledged it had been “right for all Cabinet members to want to get the best settlement for their departments”.
She added that settling departmental budgets was “an important achievement and shows the determination of this Government to get a grip of the public finances, and shows that we are as one, united in fixing the mess that the Conservatives left for us”.
Several ministers were reported to have written to the Prime Minister to express concern about the scale of cuts being demanded in some areas as the Chancellor attempts to find £40 billion with which to deliver Labour’s promises.
Such concerns are often raised as part of Budget negotiations between ministers and the Treasury but these come in the context of Labour’s promise that there will be no “return to austerity” and fears of further backlash similar to that seen after the winter fuel payment cut.
Ms Reeves insisted her Budget would be “honest” about the state of the public finances and what needed to be done to put them “on a firm footing” while doing “everything within our power” to protect living standards and the NHS.
The health service is one of the few departments expected to come out as a winner from the Budget process, with reports suggesting it will receive a significant real-terms increase in funding as the Government stakes its popularity on cutting waiting lists.
But Government sources said reports of an increase of between 3-4% were not accurate.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel