A “vital” rule change to give two organisations privileges and certain immunities has received backing from MPs.
The Lords had already supported the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and International Committee of the Red Cross (Status) Bill earlier this year, which would allow the two bodies to act in a way “comparable to that of an international organisation” which the UK has signed up to.
At its second reading on Tuesday, Conservative former minister David Mundell said his delegation was attacked on a visit to South Africa with the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association UK.
He said the assailants allegedly argued Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) delegates were “neo-colonialists” because the organisation was not an international organisation but instead a UK-based charity, and suggested conversations about the group’s status distracted from British criticism of “the assault on the LGBT community in many Commonwealth countries”.
The CPA is made up of more than 180 law-making bodies around the world, including the UK Parliament, Stormont, Holyrood and the Senedd.
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is a neutral organisation which provides assistance for people affected by conflict and natural disasters.
Mr Mundell told the Commons the CPA’s status was “top of the list of issues to be discussed by the speaker of the South African parliament” when he met with representatives, and also that “when the speaker of the Ghanaian parliament visited this country, this was the top issue on their agenda”.
On the attack, he said: “The structure of the international Commonwealth Parliamentary Association was given as one of the reasons as to why we were ‘neo-colonialists’ because the organisation wasn’t a full-standing international organisation, it was an English charity and they used that to further their arguments”.
Mr Mundell continued: “So it’s not just a nice thing to do, it’s a vital thing to do in order to ensure that we can be fully participative and respected in discussions.
“And if we want to raise difficult issues, and there are difficult issues to raise in the Commonwealth, particularly the assault on the LGBT community in many Commonwealth countries – we want to raise those issues – we can’t then be confronted, ‘Well, what are you doing about this issue that’s important to us?'”
Privileges which the CPA and ICRC could receive include immunity from legal process, some tax exemptions and some immunity from import or export restrictions.
The Bill faces further scrutiny in Parliament at a later date.
Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty said “the UK is deeply committed to the Commonwealth”.
Mr Doughty said the Bill will allow “both organisations to be treated in a manner that is comparable to an international organisation, with associated privileges and immunities”.
He added: “This Bill will give the CPA and the ICRC the correct status in legislation to allow for both organisations to continue their international operations without unnecessary restriction.”
Shadow foreign office minister Alicia Kearns welcomed the Bill and said it will “guarantee for the ICRC that sensitive information it must be able to share with the Government” is protected.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel