Charities have called for LGBT veterans who suffered historical mistreatment in the armed forces to receive adequate compensation, in an open letter to the Prime Minister.
This comes after veterans minister Al Carns vowed that a financial redress scheme for those who suffered under the “gay ban” would be launched at the start of next year.
Survivors of the scandal suffered days of sometimes brutal interrogation when it was discovered they were gay; many were dismissed from the forces, lost out on job opportunities and were shunned by families and friends.
An independent review into the service and experience of LGBT veterans who served prior to 2000, led by Lord Etherton, recommended a £50 million cap on the total sum of compensation.
The letter published on Wednesday argues that the cap on compensation could lead to “inadequate and unacceptably low” payments, with suggestions the average payout would be £12,500.
Signatories of the open letter addressed to Sir Keir Starmer include the chief executives of Fighting with Pride, Help for Heroes, the Royal British Legion, Stonewall and Age UK.
Fighting with Pride’s campaign director and Royal Navy veteran Craig Jones said: “The funding intended for this scheme is inadequate and fails to take account of the shocking treatment inflicted upon a community of veterans who defended our peace and freedom but were treated in a way which the Prime Minister said had brought dishonour on our nation.
“This is the moment for the Government to do the right thing.
“We are aware that veterans minister Al Carns is working hard to find greater funding for this scheme, but more must be done to achieve payments that bring a sense of justice for LGBT Veterans affected by this awful policy.
“We must not miss the opportunity to extend the modern values of the armed forces to veterans who were shamed for decades.”
Earlier this month, Mr Carns told the Commons that the treatment of LGBT veterans was “completely and utterly unacceptable”, adding the Government “will meet the financial redress scheme by the end of this year with the launch in January next year”.
The National Audit Office reported that up to 4,000 veterans are expected to be eligible for compensation.
Chief executive of Help for Heroes James Needham, said: “LGBT+ veterans, both before and immediately after the lifting of the ban in 2000, experienced an almost unique set of injuries due to this discriminatory policy, including wrongful imprisonment, loss of careers and pensions and exclusion from the veteran community.
“While progress has been made since then, we are concerned by the proposed compensation. Based on the Government’s estimates, veterans affected by the ban would receive an average payment of just £12,500, which isn’t enough to make up for the damage done to their lives.
“We’re also disappointed that a promised debate in Parliament may not happen before the compensation scheme starts, which would be a missed opportunity for MPs to discuss and ensure fairness for those impacted.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here