First Minister Michelle O’Neill has insisted that no armed groups should exist in Northern Ireland in this day and age.
Ms O’Neill, who is the vice-president of Sinn Fein, said any engagement with groups that are active in today’s society should only be on the basis of asking those groups to disband.
The modern day Sinn Fein was historically associated with the Provisional IRA from when the terrorist group was founded in 1969.
In 2005, the IRA released a statement announcing the end of its “armed campaign”, however some speculation has continued over whether the group’s Army Council remains in existence, and whether it has any influence over Sinn Fein.
Executive Office Committee chairwoman Paula Bradshaw asked Ms O’Neill to clarify this during the meeting of the committee on Wednesday afternoon.
Raising the Executive Office’s remit on supporting victims and survivors of the Troubles and ending the control of paramilitarism through the department’s Communities In Transition Programme, Ms Bradshaw asked for reassurances that the IRA Army Council has no influence over Sinn Fein.
“What reassurances can you give to this committee that this is not the case in terms of determining the priorities nor actions of the Executive Office,” she said.
Ms O’Neill responded saying “party political issues are not for this committee” and contended Ms Bradshaw had made a “party political statement”.
Ms Bradshaw responded saying: “I feel that for the public record that this is maybe a question that people would like to ask, that the work that comes out of the Executive Office is purely in line with what is needed by the people, by the Executive as a committee itself.”
Ms O’Neill said: “The Executive Office takes its responsibility very seriously.”
Sinn Fein MLA Caral Ni Chuilin interjected to describe the question as “completely ridiculous”, but Ms Bradshaw defended it as a “legitimate question”.
Ms O’Neill continued to say: “The Executive Office discharges all of its responsibilities very seriously, particularly when it comes to tackling criminality.
“There should be no paramilitary groups that exist in this day and age. I think that’s a shared endeavour that we all should ensure.
“Any engagement with any groups that are active in today’s society should only be on the basis of asking those groups to disband.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here