Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of breaking his promise to “back Scotch producers to the hilt”, after the Chancellor announced another increase to alcohol duty.
Delivering her first Budget on Wednesday, Rachel Reeves said tax on non-draught alcoholic drinks will increase by the higher RPI rate of inflation.
Despite the rise, it was announced that duty on draught products will be cut by 1.7%, something whisky and other spirits are excluded from.
The Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) said the tax will be a “hammer blow” to the industry.
It had called for the Chancellor to reverse the 10.1% duty increase announced last August by the Conservative government.
“Instead, the damage done to the industry and to Government revenue has been compounded by further increasing the tax burden on the sector, which is already the highest in the G7,” it said.
The industry body said the previous increase resulted in whisky revenue falling by hundreds of millions of pounds, which ultimately led to a lower intake by HMRC.
Mark Kent, chief executive of the SWA, said: “This duty increase on Scotch whisky is a hammer blow, runs counter to the Prime Minister’s commitment to ‘back Scotch producers to the hilt’, and increases the tax discrimination of Scotland’s national drink.
“On the back of the 10.1% duty increase last year, which led to a reduction in revenue for HM Treasury, this tax hike serves no economic purpose.
“It will damage the Scotch whisky industry, the Scottish economy, and undermines Labour’s commitment to promote ‘Brand Scotland’.”
Mr Kent hit out at the different rates of tax between drought and non-drought alcohol which increased in Ms Reeves’s Budget.
He said: “She has also increased the tax discrimination of spirits in the Treasury’s warped duty system, and with 70% of UK spirits produced in Scotland, that will do further damage to a key Scottish sector.
“The disastrous 10.1% duty hike last year has now been compounded.
“This further tax rise means the lessons have not been learned, and the Chancellor has chosen continuity with her predecessor, not change.
“We urge all MPs who support Scotch whisky to vote against this duty hike and tax discrimination of Scotland’s national drink.”
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray defended the alcohol duty rise, telling journalists: “We have to balance the books in terms of public spending and indeed settling and stabilising the economy.”
While he accepted the rise had “obviously not been welcomed by the whisky industry”, Mr Murray insisted: “The inflationary increase is the right thing to do in these particular circumstances.”
He added that there was an additional £750,000 for the Scotland Office budget to “promote Brand Scotland” adding that the Scotch whisky industry will “be a key part of that”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here