Thousands of people are set to march through central London to demand tougher action on keeping the UK’s rivers and seas clean.
A range of groups including River Action, Greenpeace, the Wildlife Trusts and British Rowing will take to the streets for for the campaign amid a growing water quality crisis in the UK.
The March for Clean Water will see protesters meet at the Albert Embankment on Sunday before heading along the River Thames to a rally in Parliament Square.
Our interactive map is live! 👇
Check out our map ahead of tomorrow's #MARCHFORCLEANWATER.
It includes key location & assembly points for the start of the march, as well as other important details marked along the route.https://t.co/W4wCdtOoM0
See you tomorrow & #WearBlue!💙 pic.twitter.com/sHmZbrnDNV
— March for Clean Water (@MarchforWater) November 2, 2024
Participants have been asked to bring a sample of the waters they love and to wear blue to form “a mass human river” on the march.
Environmental activist and singer Feargal Sharkey, TV presenter Chris Packham and adventurer Bear Grylls are among those expected to attend the event.
The campaign will call for an immediate root and branch review of the regulator Ofwat and the Environment Agency, the stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations on water pollution and ensuring all polluting industries invest in upgrading infrastructure, reducing water wastage and leakage and helping farmers restore habitats.
The Water (Special Measures) Bill, set out by the Government in Parliament last month, will aim to give regulators powers to issue harsher penalties to water companies that damage the environment, including severe and automatic fines, blocked bonuses and even two-year prison sentences for uncooperative executives.
A Water UK spokesperson said: “The March for Clean Water is right to demand change and we support its aims. We agree that the system is not working. It is too complicated, too slow and is not delivering for people or the environment.
“No sewage spill is ever acceptable, and water companies want to invest a record £108 billion to ensure the security of our water supply in the future and end sewage entering our rivers and seas.
“Ofwat have proposed cutting this by £20 billion. As a direct result, more housing will be blocked, the recovery of our rivers will be slower, and we will fail to deal with the water shortages we know are coming.
“We cannot delay upgrading and expanding vital infrastructure any longer and need Ofwat to reconsider its approach.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel