Low ambition and incoherent climate targets from Europe’s 20 largest banks is putting net zero goals at risk, according to an analysis.
ShareAction, which campaigns for responsible investment, scrutinised targets for emissions from financing high-impact activities and for increasing sustainable finance at banks including UK institutions HSBC, NatWest and Barclays.
The campaigners said they found that the banks’ decarbonisation targets are too narrow while their sustainable finance targets are not rooted in robust methodology.
They also concluded the two are not sufficiently aligned with one another.
Looking closer at sustainable finance targets, the analysis showed that 18 out of 20 banks are not on track to meet the 10 to one dollar ratio of green to fossil fuels investment that the International Energy Agency says is needed by 2030.
These include HSBC, Barclays and BNP Paribas.
Just NatWest and Nordea can realistically be expected to meet this milestone based on the sustainable finance targets they have set, it found.
ShareAction also warned that banks are inconsistent in their approach to target-setting, making it difficult for the public, regulators and investors to judge the real impact of their climate action efforts and be able to hold them to account.
It said that even some of the largest, most ambitious-sounding green finance targets are in reality very small relative to a bank’s size.
For example, HSBC’s goal of up to one trillion dollars towards sustainable investment by 2030 accounts for just 1.8% of its total assets, while Barclays’ is just 3.2% of its total assets, it said.
And while almost all decarbonisation targets by banks are based on a clear methodology, just 13% of sustainable targets are backed by transparent, public methodology, it added.
Xavier Lerin, senior research manager at ShareAction, said: “Europe’s biggest banks have a vital role to play in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy, such as scaling up renewable energy, making real estate energy efficient and supporting important industries to decarbonise.
“However, our analysis shows that in the majority of cases, the climate targets banks are using as a road map to transition are not fit for purpose, which is putting at risk our ability to protect society from the worst impacts of climate change.
“We urgently need banks to set more ambitious and coherent targets that transparently map out how they will live up to their commitment to finance the renewable power, green infrastructure and technologies needed to protect people and our economies.”
Ian Bhullar, head of sustainability policy at UK Finance, said: “The transition to a net zero economy is a key priority for the financial services industry.
“Strong policies to support low-emissions technologies and sectors is the best way to give certainty to lenders and investors.
“This in turn will encourage finance to go where it is needed.
“Governments can help unlock more finance by setting out clear road maps detailing the long-term approach to infrastructure and key sectors for the transition.
“At last year’s Cop summit, we saw important commitments made regarding the transition away from fossil fuels, renewable energy capacity and energy efficiency.
“We know there is still work to be done, and we look forward to continuing these vital discussions at Cop29 this month.”
The PA news agency has contacted HSBC, Barclays, BNP Paribas and NatWest for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here